| Guillaume Vlieghe 11/03/08 05:09 Read: 994 times Mouscron Belgium Msg Score: -2 -1 Non-Specific question -1 Didn't Search First |
#159552 - Asm and C |
Hello,
How include asm code in my program in C ? Thanks Regards |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Asm and C | Guillaume Vlieghe | 11/03/08 05:09 |
| Depends! | Andy Neil | 11/03/08 05:12 |
| Also | Neil Kurzman | 11/03/08 11:08 |
| No! Not Inline!! | Andy Neil | 11/03/08 11:20 |
| why not inline? | Jan Waclawek | 11/03/08 14:33 |
| I agree with Andy (at least for Keil), but .... | Erik Malund | 11/03/08 14:41 |
| Keil specifically | Andy Neil | 11/03/08 16:00 |
| Keil and reasoning | Jan Waclawek | 11/05/08 01:48 |
| Jan...Take it from experience... | Michael Karas | 11/05/08 06:36 |
| can you please explain? | Jan Waclawek | 11/05/08 06:56 |
| Example?? | Michael Karas | 11/05/08 07:03 |
| I am curious | Jan Waclawek | 11/05/08 07:20 |
| Use these references in lieu of examples: | Michael Karas | 11/05/08 07:35 |
| I explained it earlier; example here | Andy Neil | 11/05/08 08:40 |
| I now see the point with Keil... | Jan Waclawek | 11/06/08 01:49 |
| Often intrinsic use of inline assembler | Per Westermark | 11/06/08 02:32 |
| Not a safe assumption? | Andy Neil | 11/06/08 05:58 |
| No, extrapolation not allowed | Per Westermark | 11/06/08 06:35 |
| but if it is a macro... | Jan Waclawek | 11/06/08 06:36 |
| A limited example | Per Westermark | 11/06/08 07:35 |
| an opinion | Erik Malund | 11/06/08 08:00 |
| Keil specifically - more | Andy Neil | 11/26/08 10:12 |
| Why Not inline C | Neil Kurzman | 11/03/08 15:01 |
| Inline assembler - Avoid! Avoid!! | Andy Neil | 11/03/08 15:54 |
| in order to keep things together | Jan Waclawek | 11/03/08 16:35 |
| I do | Erik Malund | 11/04/08 07:39 |
| from where I sit... | Jan Waclawek | 11/04/08 14:30 |
| you said it | Erik Malund | 11/04/08 14:37 |
| this has nothing to do with it | Jan Waclawek | 11/04/08 16:38 |
| asm *functions* embedded in C-majority source file | Andy Neil | 11/04/08 17:17 |
Whay Not???  | Neil Kurzman | 11/04/08 18:07 |
| My view point on ASM in C | Mahesh Joshi | 11/05/08 01:09 |
| That is the point | Neil Kurzman | 11/06/08 00:51 |
| here is one - at least re Keil | Erik Malund | 11/05/08 07:51 |
| Maybe not here, but... | Andy Neil | 11/04/08 08:26 |
| I do not disagree | Neil Kurzman | 11/03/08 14:51 |
| Compiler ? | Mahesh Joshi | 11/03/08 06:12 |
| Get the manual when/where you get the compiler | Richard Erlacher | 11/03/08 10:47 |
| and C in asm ? | Emmanuel Coulon | 11/24/08 17:16 |
| C first? | Jan Waclawek | 11/24/08 17:37 |
| not used to call compiler generated asm so translate by hand | Emmanuel Coulon | 12/31/08 05:03 |
| if a compiler can do it | Andy Neil | 11/25/08 01:41 |
| depends on the compiler | Erik Malund | 11/25/08 07:46 |
| SDCC... | Emmanuel Coulon | 12/15/08 11:36 |
| What assembler? | Per Westermark | 12/15/08 12:18 |
| SB-asm | Emmanuel Coulon | 12/31/08 05:09 |
| In principle this should work. | David Prentice | 12/31/08 05:50 |
OTOH, why not simply write in ASM? | Richard Erlacher | 12/31/08 13:31 |