Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)


 

Back to Subject List

Alan Dorman
11/09/08 18:58
Read: 584 times
Las Vegas
USA


 		 #159915 - a simple SETB question
I know you can SETB C
and SETB Px.x
or ACC.x

But can I SETB 34H.x
a direct memory register bit?

ATMEL AT89C4051



List of 34 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
a simple SETB question      Alan Dorman      11/09/08 18:58      
   SETB from 20h to 2FH      Lynn Reed      11/09/08 21:21      
      assembler missed this one      Alan Dorman      11/09/08 23:54      
         I know of none that can't      Erik Malund      11/10/08 07:11      
   what about this?      CHARLES TOWNSEND      11/10/08 07:42      
      try ORL to set any bit in internal RAM      KONSTANTINOS L. ANGELIS      11/11/08 09:43      
         wrong, nonstandard and why      Erik Malund      11/11/08 10:04      
            ORL, Set any bit (more informative)      KONSTANTINOS L. ANGELIS      11/11/08 10:47      
               iram      Erik Malund      11/11/08 12:04      
                  Where is that defined?      Richard Erlacher      11/12/08 09:31      
                     my word was not 'defined' but      Erik Malund      11/12/08 09:41      
                        a rose, by any other name ...      Richard Erlacher      11/12/08 15:14      
                           I think Erik has it?      Andy Neil      11/12/08 16:10      
                              aliased/overlayed      Per Westermark      11/12/08 16:43      
                                 Fair enough      Andy Neil      11/12/08 17:22      
                              pDATA?      Richard Erlacher      11/12/08 19:30      
                                 Why do you think 64TB would be enough?      Per Westermark      11/12/08 20:09      
                                    It would not be      Richard Erlacher      11/13/08 00:56      
                                       Tools are important for size      Per Westermark      11/13/08 01:41      
                                          That's why there's ASM to use instead      Richard Erlacher      11/13/08 10:37      
                                       this flies against some previous posts of yours      Erik Malund      11/13/08 07:38      
                                          It's like herding cats      Richard Erlacher      11/13/08 10:48      
                                             Flame bait?      Per Westermark      11/13/08 11:48      
                                                No ... not really      Richard Erlacher      11/13/08 12:40      
                                                   yes      Per Westermark      11/13/08 12:47      
                                 PDATA & XDATA      Andy Neil      11/13/08 00:53      
                                    I won't argue that ... but ...      Richard Erlacher      11/13/08 01:05      
                                       Agreed, but...      Andy Neil      11/13/08 03:29      
                                          It is seldom that simple ...      Richard Erlacher      11/13/08 11:58      
                                             That's the point!      Andy Neil      11/13/08 12:15      
                                             since you are really interested      Erik Malund      11/13/08 12:31      
                                                Thanks!      Richard Erlacher      11/13/08 12:52      
      Yes, that is the way I normally do it      Alan Dorman      11/11/08 17:23      
      WHY TO DISTURB ACC ?      Mahesh Joshi      11/17/08 05:55      

Back to Subject List