| Andy Neil 06/15/09 01:54 Modified: 06/15/09 01:55 Read: 262 times Basingstoke Uk Msg Score: 0 -1 Provacative/Troll +1 Underrated |
#166082 - That doesn't help, and it won't work anyhow! Responding to: Murray R. Van Luyn's previous message |
For a start, it has nothing to do with the specific issue of warnings from Lint.
But it is more fundamentally flawed: Murray R. Van Luyn said:
You can instantiate a moderately accurate delay with a simple subroutine call like:
delay_ms(25); All the timing calculations are done for you No, they are not! Your code has no idea what specific instructions the compiler will generate; therefore it is impossible for it to do the timing calculations! See: http://www.8052.com/forum/read/162556 |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| s/w delay function | Sandeep Gupta | 06/02/09 00:50 |
| Software loops can be optimized away | Per Westermark | 06/02/09 01:07 |
| lacks side-effects | Neil Kurzman | 06/02/09 01:07 |
| First time with LINT? | Andy Neil | 06/02/09 01:19 |
| lacks side-effects | Andy Neil | 06/02/09 01:07 |
| That does not mean it is an error. | Neil Kurzman | 06/02/09 01:12 |
| It also blocks | Jez Smith | 06/02/09 01:49 |
| How to post legible source code | Andy Neil | 06/02/09 01:13 |
| DELAY_0.1.ZIP Useful? | Murray R. Van Luyn | 06/14/09 22:11 |
| That doesn't help, and it won't work anyhow! | Andy Neil | 06/15/09 01:54 |
| I stand by it. | Murray R. Van Luyn | 06/15/09 19:21 |
| Yes a delay function is useful | David Prentice | 06/16/09 02:39 |
| wrong !!!! | Erik Malund | 06/16/09 08:46 |
| No, that's precisely where you're wrong | Andy Neil | 06/16/09 12:35 |
| How can you say that? | Andy Neil | 06/16/09 12:43 |
| I think you should read Murray's comments | David Prentice | 06/16/09 15:20 |
| I have seen ... | Erik Malund | 06/16/09 15:45 |
Timers usable without start/stop too  | Per Westermark | 06/16/09 16:30 |
| free-running counter/timer | Andy Peters | 06/18/09 17:30 |
| Unsigned integers | Per Westermark | 06/18/09 17:39 |
| re: unsigned | Andy Peters | 06/19/09 12:16 |
| Try unsigned subtraction with borrow | Per Westermark | 06/19/09 13:05 |
bug in second (improved!?) code block | Andy Peters | 06/19/09 16:38 |
| Delay Loops in 'C'..!!! NO | Mahesh Joshi | 06/16/09 05:44 |
| Go on. Suggest a SIMPLE alternative | David Prentice | 06/16/09 06:20 |
| My Methods | Mahesh Joshi | 06/16/09 07:21 |
| So he has a long list of constraints | David Prentice | 06/16/09 07:46 |
| oh boy what a load who wil have 10 minutes for this | Erik Malund | 06/16/09 08:55 |
| Ok. I was being naughty. | David Prentice | 06/16/09 10:28 |
| you forget the obvious ... | Erik Malund | 06/16/09 10:49 |