| Per Westermark 06/16/09 03:34 Read: 311 times Sweden |
#166120 - gimme code=my own time is too valuable Responding to: Murray R. Van Luyn's previous message |
Murray said:
There is great benefit to the individual when provided with a variety of approaches to a given programming problem. Correct. But these varieties of approaches can normally be transmitted as ideas instead of as code. By trading ideas, the receiver will have a better chance of understanding the idea than receiving code. If the OP is not interesting in understanding, then I think they should consider other ways and methods. It is most helpful and advantageous to the forum members if each individual member gets information that they understand, than if they get plug-and-pray information. Plug-and-pray means that they will either give up since it doesn't work, return back with a "it doesn't work - why?" or return back with more "gimme code". Another thing: A post that describes an idea to the OP will most probably also describe that idea to a number of other forum members, so the total knowledge on the forum will grow. I have a bit of a problem with people who sees web forums as a source of free labour or as a source of free private tutors. The interesting thing here is that the group of people who have this view is quite similar to the group of people who do post "gimme code". And this is normally also the same people who would not consider the reverse direction of sharing. If they receive 5 hours of help, they would normally not be interested in spending 5 hours helping someone else for free. After all, everyone can help with anything. Possibly just asking a neighbour if they need help shopping. The "gimme code" people tends to be very, very self-centered. And if they do not get the help they (for some strange reason) consider they have the right to, they tend to switch to complaints about "not fair", "I had too little time", "the professor is stupid", ... Whenever you are ready to discuss concepts, I think you can select almost any forum, and you will find people who are ready to discuss and help. But switching to the specifics of "gimme code", you are basically saying "do my work for me - my own time is too valuable". |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| What's wrong with gimme code? | Murray R. Van Luyn | 06/15/09 23:24 |
| Mainly | Jez Smith | 06/16/09 00:33 |
| I agree with Jez Smith | Kiran V. Sutar | 06/16/09 01:49 |
| Non academic gimme code? | Murray R. Van Luyn | 06/16/09 02:41 |
| This makes me very suspicious | Jez Smith | 06/16/09 02:52 |
| gimme code=my own time is too valuable | Per Westermark | 06/16/09 03:34 |
| Easy to see which is school assignment | David Prentice | 06/16/09 03:54 |
| The wise student needs pointers, not complete solutions | Per Westermark | 06/16/09 04:24 |
| "Here's what I've come up with ... | Christoph Franck | 06/16/09 04:56 |
| But what's wrong in asking for an example implementaton? | Jan Waclawek | 06/16/09 05:12 |
| The teacher recognises the good student | David Prentice | 06/16/09 05:33 |
| Now there's a laugh if ever there was one ... | Richard Erlacher | 06/16/09 13:35 |
| nothing IF ... | Erik Malund | 06/16/09 08:50 |
| children should do their own homework | Richard Erlacher | 06/16/09 13:32 |
| What's wrong with gimmee code. | Joseph Hebert | 06/16/09 00:44 |
| Sounds Like; Whats wrong with Spoon Feeding..? | Mahesh Joshi | 06/16/09 06:05 |
| perhaps it enables ... | David Prentice | 06/16/09 06:28 |
| Generic solutions applicable to more people | Per Westermark | 06/16/09 07:28 |
| Then they'll become expert at potty ... | Richard Erlacher | 06/16/09 13:37 |
| it makes you dumb! | Erik Malund | 06/16/09 08:42 |
| How'd you like ten of those guys working for you? | Richard Erlacher | 06/16/09 13:39 |
| But that's the point! | Kai Klaas | 06/17/09 08:39 |
| We agree in principle, Kai ... but ... | Richard Erlacher | 06/17/09 10:16 |
| Hiring & firing is expensive! | Andy Neil | 06/18/09 01:42 |
| and that's not all! | Richard Erlacher | 06/18/09 07:41 |
| As an example | Jez Smith | 06/16/09 15:17 |
| No-one is suggesting breach of copyright | David Prentice | 06/16/09 15:37 |
| arrogance? | Erik Malund | 06/16/09 15:48 |
| Examples of Erik's arrogance | Hans Heinz | 06/17/09 08:52 |
| no, I do not state any such, | Erik Malund | 06/17/09 09:15 |
| A couple of corrections | Richard Erlacher | 06/17/09 10:29 |
| more useful product? | Erik Malund | 06/17/09 12:30 |
| life is not B&W | Jan Waclawek | 06/16/09 15:53 |
| Good help _is_ to a big part to give hints | Per Westermark | 06/16/09 16:47 |
| Votes and freedom of speech? | Per Westermark | 06/16/09 16:57 |
| When I was a youngster ... | Richard Erlacher | 06/17/09 02:01 |
| Returning to the original subject. | David Prentice | 06/17/09 02:24 |
| same same but sometimes different | Per Westermark | 06/17/09 02:57 |
| Since you like AVRFREAKS so much ... | Richard Erlacher | 06/17/09 10:43 |
| Versatility and diversification | Per Westermark | 06/17/09 02:52 |
| This is 8052.COM | Richard Erlacher | 06/17/09 10:35 |
| and..... | Jez Smith | 06/17/09 05:05 |
| There's always help for those who can do their own work. | Richard Erlacher | 06/17/09 01:40 |
| There's the key! | Andy Neil | 06/17/09 01:54 |
| that is not the issue | Erik Malund | 06/17/09 09:18 |
| I'm with you 100% on that, Erik | Richard Erlacher | 06/17/09 10:46 |
| calm down Richard | Jez Smith | 06/17/09 11:23 |
| support for more MCU's makes it more widely useful | Richard Erlacher | 06/17/09 16:26 |
| it? | Erik Malund | 06/18/09 08:44 |
| Which MCU's will KEIL support? | Richard Erlacher | 06/18/09 13:22 |
| Irrelevant | Per Westermark | 06/18/09 16:34 |
| Keil's blind spot | Andy Neil | 06/18/09 17:33 |
| Keil will probably get squeezed | Per Westermark | 06/18/09 17:50 |
| If only that were the case | Richard Erlacher | 06/18/09 22:49 |
| Portable 'C' [edited] | Andy Neil | 06/19/09 01:56 |
| Write what you mean or mean what you write | Per Westermark | 06/19/09 03:33 |
| OK ... Here's the point | Richard Erlacher | 06/19/09 16:13 |
| If bugs is a big problem - consider your compiler choices | Per Westermark | 06/19/09 17:37 |
| C is not that difficult | David Prentice | 06/19/09 04:20 |
| I can't totally disagree ... it's a matter of degree | Richard Erlacher | 06/19/09 19:27 |
| Richard misses the point completely | Jez Smith | 06/20/09 00:18 |
| The thing is... | Andy Neil | 06/17/09 17:08 |
| I don't think thats true at all | Jez Smith | 06/18/09 04:13 |
| Not what I meant | Andy Neil | 06/18/09 05:15 |
| Andy's right! | Richard Erlacher | 06/18/09 08:11 |
| elders and betters would have given a helpful reply. | Andy Neil | 06/28/09 19:15 |
| If you think 8052.com is bad ... | Andy Peters | 06/17/09 13:14 |
| When was it the last time someone asked for code? | Jan Waclawek | 06/17/09 15:56 |
| oohhh | Jez Smith | 06/17/09 16:04 |
| Here? | Andy Neil | 06/17/09 16:23 |
| Latest example of "Gimme Code" | Andy Neil | 06/28/09 19:01 |
| What the forums are all about | CHARLES TOWNSEND | 06/26/09 07:39 |
| Progress | Steve M. Taylor | 06/26/09 10:41 |
| No, don't agree with "exhausted all the possibilities" | Per Westermark | 06/26/09 11:22 |
| patience | CHARLES TOWNSEND | 06/27/09 08:28 |
| inexperienced | CHARLES TOWNSEND | 06/27/09 08:16 |
| Well actually... | Steve M. Taylor | 06/27/09 09:44 |
| you must have a very smart wife | Erik Malund | 06/27/09 09:59 |
| If you're a friend ;-) | Steve M. Taylor | 06/28/09 04:30 |
| arrogant? | Erik Malund | 06/26/09 13:44 |
| encouragement | CHARLES TOWNSEND | 06/27/09 08:34 |
| absolutely | Erik Malund | 06/27/09 09:05 |
| What you have to remember | Jez Smith | 06/27/09 22:30 |
| Tim Berners-Lee | Steve M. Taylor | 06/28/09 04:33 |
| he only invented the web thingy | Jez Smith | 06/28/09 10:49 |
| Exhausted all the possibilities... | Per Westermark | 06/28/09 13:25 |
| this is just not fair | Jan Waclawek | 06/28/09 13:47 |
| It's about attitude | Per Westermark | 06/28/09 15:22 |
| on intentions etc. | Jan Waclawek | 06/28/09 16:27 |
| 98% of 100 | Andy Neil | 06/28/09 19:23 |
| good and bad | Erik Malund | 06/28/09 15:24 |
| OK Charles (et al), here's your chance! | Andy Neil | 06/28/09 18:58 |
| re: OK Charles here's your chance | CHARLES TOWNSEND | 07/02/09 07:44 |
| QED. | Andy Neil | 07/02/09 08:58 |
Yet one more exhausted visitor | Per Westermark | 07/03/09 02:40 |



