Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
Jez Smith
06/21/09 14:33
Modified:
  06/21/09 14:54

Read: 244 times
Birmingham
England


 
#166317 - I cannot remember now
Responding to: Girish Nikam's previous message
I haven't looked at sdcc for a while but doesn't it defferenciate between a signal and an interrupt where an interrupt occurs once and is then disabled and a signal is never disabled?
I may be talking giberish here, but why change the habit of a lifetime is what I say.
I haven't looked too closely at your code but that my first thought anyway,if it works in one compiler and not another its usualy some difference in the way the compiler interprets something.

List of 17 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
UART code porting to SDCC      Girish Nikam      06/21/09 13:29      
   doesn't SDCC warn about line 36?      Frieder Ferlemann      06/21/09 13:59      
      that's it      Jan Waclawek      06/21/09 15:03      
         ah ha      Jez Smith      06/21/09 15:08      
            Don't blame the optimiser!      Andy Neil      06/22/09 01:36      
      doesn't SDCC warn about line 36      Girish Nikam      06/21/09 22:13      
         hmmm      Jez Smith      06/22/09 00:42      
         modified dog      Andy Peters      06/23/09 14:21      
   I cannot remember now      Jez Smith      06/21/09 14:33      
   xmt_flag., why "int"?      Mahesh Joshi      06/22/09 01:53      
      if you want to use it as "int" / "char"      Andy Neil      06/22/09 02:47      
   You destroy succeding putchar()'s      David Prentice      06/22/09 05:14      
      "Volatile" Helps      Girish Nikam      06/22/09 07:42      
         "bit" is more useful      Mahesh Joshi      06/22/09 08:16      
            buzzzzz      Erik Malund      06/22/09 08:37      
               family      Jan Waclawek      06/22/09 13:44      
            stdbool      Oliver Sedlacek      06/23/09 06:44      

Back to Subject List