| Jez Smith 06/22/09 01:50 Modified: 06/22/09 01:51 Read: 315 times Birmingham England |
#166330 - You beat me to it... Responding to: Per Westermark's previous message |
If you have got large numbers of timers running then you may get problems with skew where it takes so long to update them all that they are not syncronous.It will certainly happen if your timer resolution is too high. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
Pseudo timers make programming delays easy.  | Murray R. Van Luyn | 06/21/09 23:10 |
| volatile + racing condition | Per Westermark | 06/21/09 23:55 |
| slow processors | Per Westermark | 06/22/09 01:27 |
| You beat me to it... | Jez Smith | 06/22/09 01:50 |
| Timers_0.1 available. | Murray R. Van Luyn | 06/22/09 01:52 |
| SDCC | Jan Waclawek | 06/22/09 02:19 |
| ISR defining with SDCC | Mahesh Joshi | 06/22/09 02:42 |
| oh, I just read it in the manual | Jan Waclawek | 06/22/09 02:50 |
| only conditionally, as #ifdef SDCC | Andy Neil | 06/22/09 03:20 |
| SDCC and ISRs | Andy Peters | 06/23/09 14:17 |
| Prototyping ISRs | Andy Neil | 06/23/09 16:04 |
| you can see it as if.... | Jan Waclawek | 06/23/09 16:39 |
| SDCC Quirk? | Andy Neil | 06/23/09 16:56 |
internals of SDCC  | Maarten Brock | 07/08/09 14:31 |
| duh | Andy Peters | 06/24/09 14:49 |
| Too quick | Per Westermark | 06/22/09 02:38 |
| I see something else... | Jan Waclawek | 06/22/09 02:53 |
| That helped. | Murray R. Van Luyn | 06/22/09 22:33 |
| Oops! Timers_0.2 available. | Murray R. Van Luyn | 06/22/09 22:23 |
| you persist | Erik Malund | 06/23/09 07:25 |
| Good idea! | Andy Neil | 06/22/09 01:46 |
| atomicity | Erik Malund | 06/22/09 08:13 |
| No | Jez Smith | 06/23/09 08:40 |
| I gladly, click on a link .... | Erik Malund | 06/23/09 08:53 |
| Direct link | Jon Ledbetter | 06/23/09 10:54 |
| that was clearly possible, I wonder why ... | Erik Malund | 06/23/09 14:11 |
| one more thing, now we are digging deep | Erik Malund | 06/25/09 06:37 |