Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)


 

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
Erik Malund
06/23/09 14:11
Read: 286 times
Mt Airy, Nc
USA


 		 #166399 - that was clearly possible, I wonder why ...
Responding to: Jon Ledbetter's previous message
... the OP TWICE Would not do that.

anyhow re. the code

If there is an interrupt coincidence there is a slight possibility that reloading the timers without stop/load/start will give an error of 256 counts.

also I would do this
#if TIMER_COUNT >=1
timer0...
#endif
#if TIMER_COUNT >=2
timer1...
#endif
......
......

Erik

List of 29 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Pseudo timers make programming delays easy.        Murray R. Van Luyn      06/21/09 23:10      
   volatile + racing condition      Per Westermark      06/21/09 23:55      
      slow processors      Per Westermark      06/22/09 01:27      
         You beat me to it...      Jez Smith      06/22/09 01:50      
      Timers_0.1 available.      Murray R. Van Luyn      06/22/09 01:52      
         SDCC      Jan Waclawek      06/22/09 02:19      
            ISR defining with SDCC      Mahesh Joshi      06/22/09 02:42      
               oh, I just read it in the manual      Jan Waclawek      06/22/09 02:50      
                  only conditionally, as #ifdef SDCC      Andy Neil      06/22/09 03:20      
               SDCC and ISRs      Andy Peters      06/23/09 14:17      
                  Prototyping ISRs      Andy Neil      06/23/09 16:04      
                     you can see it as if....      Jan Waclawek      06/23/09 16:39      
                        SDCC Quirk?      Andy Neil      06/23/09 16:56      
                           internals of SDCC        Maarten Brock      07/08/09 14:31      
                     duh      Andy Peters      06/24/09 14:49      
         Too quick        Per Westermark      06/22/09 02:38      
            I see something else...        Jan Waclawek      06/22/09 02:53      
               That helped.      Murray R. Van Luyn      06/22/09 22:33      
            Oops! Timers_0.2 available.      Murray R. Van Luyn      06/22/09 22:23      
               you persist      Erik Malund      06/23/09 07:25      
   Good idea!      Andy Neil      06/22/09 01:46      
   atomicity      Erik Malund      06/22/09 08:13      
      No      Jez Smith      06/23/09 08:40      
         I gladly, click on a link ....      Erik Malund      06/23/09 08:53      
            Direct link      Jon Ledbetter      06/23/09 10:54      
               that was clearly possible, I wonder why ...      Erik Malund      06/23/09 14:11      
               one more thing, now we are digging deep      Erik Malund      06/25/09 06:37      

Back to Subject List