Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
Gopal Amlekar
01/10/10 09:09
Read: 670 times
Pune
India


 
#172317 - ADC0809 problem
Hi,
I am interfacing an ADC0809 with Microchip PIC18F4550 (Wait.. it is also related to 8051).

To channel 1 of ADC0809, a potentiometer voltage divider is connected. What happens is this input voltage is at 4.5V initially till ALE pulse goes high. The moment ALE goes high (As per ADC datasheet, ALE rising edge latches address data into the ADC) this voltage drops down to 2V. ADC then measures this 2V and outputs equivalent digital data.

Strange thing is this does not happen with 8051(P89V51RD2). The input voltage is not at all affected. This is what it should be.

I have compared program flow (both progams are in C), pulse widths, timings, voltage levels on pins etc. of 8051 and PIC and found no significant difference.

Anyone can guide what can be the cause or how to troubleshoot it?

Thanks

p.s. I am posting this thread on microchip forum too.

List of 14 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
ADC0809 problem      Gopal Amlekar      01/10/10 09:09      
   Is the very same ADC chip in both cases?      Daniel Contarino      01/10/10 09:51      
   From time to time...      Kai Klaas      01/10/10 14:22      
      Datasheet read, same hardware      Gopal Amlekar      01/11/10 02:53      
         Define 1000000000%      Per Westermark      01/11/10 06:48      
         Thoughts...      Kai Klaas      01/11/10 09:04      
            Solved partially      Gopal Amlekar      01/13/10 04:06      
               So the cap did help?      Kai Klaas      01/13/10 08:56      
                  RE: That cap did help?      Gopal Amlekar      01/15/10 06:48      
                     The input multiplexer is damaged!        Kai Klaas      01/15/10 08:49      
                        Discharge diode        Per Westermark      01/15/10 10:14      
                        RE: The input multiplexer is damaged      Gopal Amlekar      01/16/10 02:01      
                           Indeed, a very poor design!!!      Kai Klaas      01/16/10 09:38      
                              RE: Indeed, a very poor design!!!      Gopal Amlekar      01/17/10 06:27      

Back to Subject List