| Jez Smith 01/13/10 01:06 Modified: 01/13/10 01:09 Read: 214 times Birmingham England |
#172411 - Hmmm Responding to: Richard Erlacher's previous message |
Sounds like a recipe for disaster to me, Asyncronous designs look good on paper but are notoriouly difficult to get to work and none of the tools available are going to work very well, personaly I doubt you would ever get it to work.
Our most bug ridden product uses some asyncronous stuff and since the guy who wrote it left nobody understands how it works or is willing to touch it with a barge pole. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Asynchronous 8051 core | Maxim Rykunov | 01/12/10 15:14 |
| What, exactly, do you mean? Asynchronous 8051??? | Richard Erlacher | 01/12/10 15:22 |
| asynchronous, as in... | Jan Waclawek | 01/12/10 16:12 |
| I rather hoped the O/P would answer that question. | Richard Erlacher | 01/12/10 22:20 |
| Hmmm | Jez Smith | 01/13/10 01:06 |
| . | Maxim Rykunov | 01/14/10 12:12 |
| O/P = original poster, it means, you | Jan Waclawek | 01/14/10 12:19 |
| Still searching.... | Maxim Rykunov | 01/14/10 12:14 |
| if you do get it working | Jez Smith | 01/14/10 15:37 |
opencores: no, but has async-not-8051 and 8051-not-async | James Hinnant | 02/05/10 15:05 |