| Kiran V. Sutar 01/13/10 04:09 Modified: 01/13/10 04:12 Read: 234 times Mumbai India |
#172419 - I agree Justin..but... Responding to: Justin Fontes's previous message |
Hi Justin Fontes,
Just review this thread from the first post: Look at the first post in this thread by the OP. Poonam Kothawade said:
I want to connect two 8051 . Shall I use I2C or serial communication? What would be your answer? Look at the number of posts in this thread talking about I2C and UART. After all those many posts...if the OP now tells you that: 1. the 2 8051s are on the same board...what will be your answer? or 2. the distance between 8051s is 10mtrs or more, with noisy environment...what will be your answer? or 3. the speed of data transfer is >1Mhz...what will be your answer? or 4..... How would you feel after about 30~40 posts in this thread the OP gives the above information. Let us assume "the OP says it is Option 1 above." Now how would the other members feel when they have posted for serial communication, SPI, Parallel... Wouldn't they feel, that their precious time would have been saved, if the OP had given this information in the first post? There are "n" number of possible answers to the OPs question. You cannot suggest the right solution unless you know some more details about the product. Justin Fontes said:
There is no need in telling everybody every detail about the project which basically opens the portal to stealing of ideas. (Well, I am NOT asking to divert the core design of the product), but you can atleast give this much information? We never asked "what is your product", or "other product details", we have asked only the information related to the question; so that the OP gets to the solution fast. And, I don't think, anybody can copy the product just by answering the above questions !!! OP asked only for "how to connect" she never diverted the information of what data is flowing between the 8051s, or what is the product? In so many years, I do not remember a single incident when anybody has asked for product details other than that required to come to a solution for the OPs question. Edit: My argument is the OP must give some background information about the question, that will help to come to solution very quickly. It will save everybody's time and energy. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Connecting two 8051s | Poonam Kothawade | 01/08/10 01:31 |
| ther are lots of interfaces | Neil Kurzman | 01/08/10 01:58 |
| "RS232" (sic?) | Andy Neil | 01/08/10 02:25 |
| That is why i said type | Neil Kurzman | 01/08/10 18:08 |
| a slight difference of opinion | Erik Malund | 01/08/10 07:43 |
| I'm (probably) with Neil | Andy Neil | 01/08/10 08:35 |
| I do not, specifically if ... | Erik Malund | 01/08/10 08:50 |
| I thought you'd like that! | Andy Neil | 01/08/10 09:33 |
| I was looking from a code point of veiw | Neil Kurzman | 01/08/10 18:14 |
| if one was the best there would only be one. | Andy Neil | 01/09/10 03:38 |
| yes and no | Erik Malund | 01/09/10 07:41 |
| Lots of interfaces - Microwire; SPI; I2C | Andy Neil | 01/08/10 08:31 |
| parallel? | Maarten Brock | 01/10/10 04:01 |
| You may use whatever you like! | Andy Neil | 01/08/10 02:18 |
| I2C is serial communication. | Richard Erlacher | 01/08/10 09:44 |
| Already noted | Andy Neil | 01/08/10 10:50 |
| Sorry ... didn't mean to steal your thunder ... | Richard Erlacher | 01/08/10 12:49 |
| Is this (question) a Joke ...??? | Kiran V. Sutar | 01/09/10 12:25 |
| Very tired of the "depends" response | Justin Fontes | 01/10/10 00:41 |
| Agreed...but this happens always... | Kiran V. Sutar | 01/10/10 01:21 |
| I think you missed the point! | Andy Neil | 01/10/10 02:41 |
| Re: 'Depends'.. | Gopal Amlekar | 01/10/10 06:53 |
| it's typical ... | Richard Erlacher | 01/10/10 08:18 |
| All too common! | Andy Neil | 01/10/10 08:52 |
| FAQ isn't easy - flowchart not adequate | Per Westermark | 01/10/10 07:12 |
| Exactly! | Andy Neil | 01/10/10 08:50 |
| You wouldn't do it in everyday life - so why do it here?! | Andy Neil | 01/10/10 09:00 |
| Concrete enough? | Kai Klaas | 01/10/10 13:31 |
| Wow! | Andy Neil | 01/10/10 16:28 |
| Yes, for a while... | Kai Klaas | 01/11/10 08:42 |
| Well.. is this pretty good? | Justin Fontes | 01/11/10 21:15 |
| Still missing the point? | Andy Neil | 01/12/10 03:41 |
| Youre missing my point | Justin Fontes | 01/12/10 10:48 |
| Exactly!! | Kai Klaas | 01/12/10 11:12 |
| I see - but disagree | Andy Neil | 01/12/10 11:21 |
| not 'demanding' but 'asking' is encouraged | Erik Malund | 01/12/10 11:35 |
| Still often not possible to help... | Per Westermark | 01/12/10 17:45 |
| I agree Justin..but... | Kiran V. Sutar | 01/13/10 04:09 |
| Lots of usage details possible without giving product away | Per Westermark | 01/13/10 08:29 |
| My answer was to be quiet! | Kai Klaas | 01/13/10 08:35 |
| I will admit.... | Justin Fontes | 01/13/10 11:38 |
| That's why folks should search before posting! | Richard Erlacher | 01/13/10 12:21 |
| Please provide more details... | Anurag Mishra | 03/22/10 07:06 |
Don't you think it's a bit late for that?! | Andy Neil | 03/22/10 07:16 |



