Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
Per Westermark
01/13/10 08:29
Read: 171 times
Sweden


 
#172428 - Lots of usage details possible without giving product away
Responding to: Kiran V. Sutar's previous message
The people who spend time answering questions most probably already have commercial projects running.

And in a real-life situation, it takes a huge amount of information to specify a project. Even a small (tiny) project may have 50 pages of specifications. A half page of text describing how a serial channel is used (without discussing what data that is encoded into the stream) will not contain enough information to hurt a new, inventive, project.

You don't give out secrets by telling:
- how much data?
- bursty or continuous stream?
- large or small messages?
- send-and-forget or with acknowledge?
- need for error detection?
- need for error correction?
- short/long distance?
- galvanically separated?
- wire or wireless?
- low/high voltages?
- simplex/semi-duplex/duplex?
- point-to-point, bus with multiple slaves, or multi-masters?
- need for risetime-limitations?
- needs to be designed with internal hardware, or external driver chips or full controllers accepted?
- amount of code space allowed for code implementation?
- amount of RAM space allowed?
- low-volume where cost doesn't matter but quick to market?
- high-volume where development time doesn't matter, but each component counts?
- limited board space?
- fixed processors? ok to change to pin-compatible alternative? ok to switch even if not pin-compatible?
- hotplug?
- ...

A flowchart trying to compile a full selection guild would obviously quickly grow into infinity.

List of 44 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Connecting two 8051s      Poonam Kothawade      01/08/10 01:31      
   ther are lots of interfaces      Neil Kurzman      01/08/10 01:58      
      "RS232" (sic?)      Andy Neil      01/08/10 02:25      
         That is why i said type      Neil Kurzman      01/08/10 18:08      
      a slight difference of opinion      Erik Malund      01/08/10 07:43      
         I'm (probably) with Neil      Andy Neil      01/08/10 08:35      
            I do not, specifically if ...      Erik Malund      01/08/10 08:50      
               I thought you'd like that!      Andy Neil      01/08/10 09:33      
            I was looking from a code point of veiw      Neil Kurzman      01/08/10 18:14      
               if one was the best there would only be one.      Andy Neil      01/09/10 03:38      
               yes and no      Erik Malund      01/09/10 07:41      
      Lots of interfaces - Microwire; SPI; I2C      Andy Neil      01/08/10 08:31      
      parallel?      Maarten Brock      01/10/10 04:01      
   You may use whatever you like!      Andy Neil      01/08/10 02:18      
   I2C is serial communication.      Richard Erlacher      01/08/10 09:44      
      Already noted      Andy Neil      01/08/10 10:50      
         Sorry ... didn't mean to steal your thunder ...      Richard Erlacher      01/08/10 12:49      
   Is this (question) a Joke ...???      Kiran V. Sutar      01/09/10 12:25      
      Very tired of the "depends" response      Justin Fontes      01/10/10 00:41      
         Agreed...but this happens always...      Kiran V. Sutar      01/10/10 01:21      
         I think you missed the point!        Andy Neil      01/10/10 02:41      
            Re: 'Depends'..      Gopal Amlekar      01/10/10 06:53      
               it's typical ...      Richard Erlacher      01/10/10 08:18      
               All too common!      Andy Neil      01/10/10 08:52      
            FAQ isn't easy - flowchart not adequate      Per Westermark      01/10/10 07:12      
               Exactly!      Andy Neil      01/10/10 08:50      
            You wouldn't do it in everyday life - so why do it here?!      Andy Neil      01/10/10 09:00      
         Concrete enough?        Kai Klaas      01/10/10 13:31      
            Wow!      Andy Neil      01/10/10 16:28      
               Yes, for a while...      Kai Klaas      01/11/10 08:42      
         Well.. is this pretty good?        Justin Fontes      01/11/10 21:15      
            Still missing the point?      Andy Neil      01/12/10 03:41      
               Youre missing my point      Justin Fontes      01/12/10 10:48      
                  Exactly!!      Kai Klaas      01/12/10 11:12      
                  I see - but disagree      Andy Neil      01/12/10 11:21      
                  not 'demanding' but 'asking' is encouraged      Erik Malund      01/12/10 11:35      
                     Still often not possible to help...        Per Westermark      01/12/10 17:45      
                  I agree Justin..but...      Kiran V. Sutar      01/13/10 04:09      
                     Lots of usage details possible without giving product away      Per Westermark      01/13/10 08:29      
                     My answer was to be quiet!      Kai Klaas      01/13/10 08:35      
                  I will admit....      Justin Fontes      01/13/10 11:38      
                     That's why folks should search before posting!      Richard Erlacher      01/13/10 12:21      
   Please provide more details...      Anurag Mishra      03/22/10 07:06      
      Don't you think it's a bit late for that?!      Andy Neil      03/22/10 07:16      

Back to Subject List