Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)


 

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
Erik Malund
02/05/10 14:48
Read: 129 times
Mt Airy, Nc
USA


 		 #172930 - I (dis)agree
Responding to: Richard Erlacher's previous message
One of the problems with solderless breadboards is that they are so fragile, i.e. the circuits built on them are easily disturbed
I agree

Further, people using them seldom take the physical parameters of the breadboard, i.e. adjacent contact capacitance, resistance, inductance, etc.
I agree, but disagree as to relevance for detecting a pushbutton

Erik

List of 13 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Buttons - Hardware      Joel Ward      02/05/10 11:51      
   do double check ....      Erik Malund      02/05/10 11:55      
   Debouncing      Andy Neil      02/05/10 12:55      
   Have you considered that it could simply be the "breadboard"      Richard Erlacher      02/05/10 13:56      
      I (dis)agree      Erik Malund      02/05/10 14:48      
      Relevance to pushbuttons      Andy Neil      02/06/10 03:01      
         Consider the objective      Richard Erlacher      02/06/10 08:03      
            Agreed      Andy Neil      02/06/10 08:39      
               that's why there's so fluid a definition for "working"      Richard Erlacher      02/06/10 13:08      
                  PCB's to match the contact arrangement on a "breadboard"      Andy Neil      02/06/10 13:25      
                     Not exactly ...      Richard Erlacher      02/06/10 18:05      
                        Solved:      Joel Ward      02/07/10 06:18      
                           Never discharge a cap directly by a switch!        Kai Klaas      02/07/10 08:10      

Back to Subject List