| Andy Neil 02/06/10 08:39 Read: 129 times Basingstoke Uk |
#172947 - Agreed Responding to: Richard Erlacher's previous message |
Richard Erlacher said:
My complaint in this particular context is not so much with the likelihood that the solderless breadboard will introduce those undesired analog parameters into the equation as with the fact that the results you get on Thursday may well be quite different than those you got on Tuesday. Especially as physically pressing a pushbutton means that you are, unavoidably, "disturbing" the breadboard! In the context of working a pushbutton, I believe it's like spitting into the wind. Indeed - it's a whole area of doubt & uncertainty that you just don't need! |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Buttons - Hardware | Joel Ward | 02/05/10 11:51 |
| do double check .... | Erik Malund | 02/05/10 11:55 |
| Debouncing | Andy Neil | 02/05/10 12:55 |
| Have you considered that it could simply be the "breadboard" | Richard Erlacher | 02/05/10 13:56 |
| I (dis)agree | Erik Malund | 02/05/10 14:48 |
| Relevance to pushbuttons | Andy Neil | 02/06/10 03:01 |
| Consider the objective | Richard Erlacher | 02/06/10 08:03 |
| Agreed | Andy Neil | 02/06/10 08:39 |
| that's why there's so fluid a definition for "working" | Richard Erlacher | 02/06/10 13:08 |
| PCB's to match the contact arrangement on a "breadboard" | Andy Neil | 02/06/10 13:25 |
| Not exactly ... | Richard Erlacher | 02/06/10 18:05 |
| Solved: | Joel Ward | 02/07/10 06:18 |
Never discharge a cap directly by a switch!   | Kai Klaas | 02/07/10 08:10 |