| Richard Erlacher 02/08/10 16:55 Read: 175 times Denver, Co USA |
#172984 - It isn't as simple as it looks. Responding to: Mahmood Elnasser's previous message |
If you examine the schematics of those regulators, you'll see that they buffer an internal reference voltage with a darlington. That darlington can source current, but there's really nothing in there that can sink a significant current. It's different from a pair of stacked batteries, in the respect that the batteries can sink current, but the regulators can't. Not even a positive and a negative regulator will work adequately, since they'll not always agree on what they're doing, which can produce sometimes unpredictable and always undesirable results.
Your input voltage is from a battery, and not from a rectified and filtered AC input. As a result, you really don't need the regulator features that mitigate the input ripple and other input-induced effects. In theory, your input supply is essentially "dead quiet." A power op-amp, with sufficient (meaning considerably more than your output requirements) output power, can produce a pseudo-GND that will support a moderately low-current system consisting of two zener diodes, or two transistor-buffered zeners. You could even use an op-amp to buffer each of the two zeners, or even use two op-amps to generate that bipolar output with a single zener reference, one as an inverting amp, and one as a buffer. I'd suggest you look at datasheets for very old voltage regulators, e.g. LM305 and uA723, not to copy them, but merely to understand the techniques involved. RE |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| voltage regulator design | Mahmood Elnasser | 02/07/10 12:54 |
| Implement an "Inverting Buck-Boost"... | Kai Klaas | 02/07/10 13:34 |
| ultra low noise | Mahmood Elnasser | 02/07/10 14:20 |
| You're right ... | Richard Erlacher | 02/07/10 15:35 |
| reghardless of the urban legends and ... | Erik Malund | 02/07/10 16:19 |
| You need a rail splitter | Oliver Sedlacek | 02/08/10 07:19 |
| no, he does not | Erik Malund | 02/08/10 07:40 |
| When the Engine starts | Andy Neil | 02/08/10 08:06 |
| Engine? | Rob Klein | 02/08/10 08:10 |
| Ummm... | Andy Neil | 02/08/10 09:04 |
| That's not a given ... | Richard Erlacher | 02/08/10 09:39 |
| I stand by what I said | Oliver Sedlacek | 02/08/10 11:38 |
| Which one? | Richard Erlacher | 02/08/10 13:10 |
| Rail splitter | Mahmood Elnasser | 02/08/10 15:29 |
| It isn't as simple as it looks. | Richard Erlacher | 02/08/10 16:55 |
| it is ... | Erik Malund | 02/08/10 17:18 |
| Did you even read the original spec's? | Richard Erlacher | 02/09/10 00:04 |
| reverse engineering | Mahmood Elnasser | 02/09/10 02:24 |
| Let me try .. | AP Charles | 02/09/10 02:53 |
| Reply | Mahmood Elnasser | 02/09/10 12:02 |
| Reply | AP Charles | 02/09/10 23:25 |
| Like this | Oliver Sedlacek | 02/09/10 06:41 |
| This should work well | Richard Erlacher | 02/09/10 09:07 |
| The problem with the TLE2426 is... | Kai Klaas | 02/09/10 14:30 |
| quite true, that's why the op-amp is better | Richard Erlacher | 02/10/10 00:36 |
| Link.... | AP Charles | 02/10/10 00:37 |
| probably still too weak ... | Richard Erlacher | 02/10/10 23:38 |
...and instable... | Kai Klaas | 02/11/10 19:13 |
| True, opamp alternative | Oliver Sedlacek | 02/10/10 06:04 |
| There are several | Rob Klein | 02/10/10 11:57 |



