| Ap Charles 02/09/10 02:53 Modified: 02/09/10 02:54 Read: 184 times |
#172992 - Let me try .. Responding to: Mahmood Elnasser's previous message |
Mahmood Elnasser said:
So do you mean that a rail splitter like this won't work because the lower regulator cannot sink current?
Mahmood http://www.8052.com/users/apc/ps-railsplit.GIF Take care Mahmood, I didnt test this ckt more analysis is required resistors will induce noise. When you fully charge the battery the more your regulator will dissipate and bigger the sink you require at elevated ambient ,deration etc . Why did you oppose Kai's solution it could be made low noise and smaller. -Ap |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| voltage regulator design | Mahmood Elnasser | 02/07/10 12:54 |
| Implement an "Inverting Buck-Boost"... | Kai Klaas | 02/07/10 13:34 |
| ultra low noise | Mahmood Elnasser | 02/07/10 14:20 |
| You're right ... | Richard Erlacher | 02/07/10 15:35 |
| reghardless of the urban legends and ... | Erik Malund | 02/07/10 16:19 |
| You need a rail splitter | Oliver Sedlacek | 02/08/10 07:19 |
| no, he does not | Erik Malund | 02/08/10 07:40 |
| When the Engine starts | Andy Neil | 02/08/10 08:06 |
| Engine? | Rob Klein | 02/08/10 08:10 |
| Ummm... | Andy Neil | 02/08/10 09:04 |
| That's not a given ... | Richard Erlacher | 02/08/10 09:39 |
| I stand by what I said | Oliver Sedlacek | 02/08/10 11:38 |
| Which one? | Richard Erlacher | 02/08/10 13:10 |
| Rail splitter | Mahmood Elnasser | 02/08/10 15:29 |
| It isn't as simple as it looks. | Richard Erlacher | 02/08/10 16:55 |
| it is ... | Erik Malund | 02/08/10 17:18 |
| Did you even read the original spec's? | Richard Erlacher | 02/09/10 00:04 |
| reverse engineering | Mahmood Elnasser | 02/09/10 02:24 |
| Let me try .. | AP Charles | 02/09/10 02:53 |
| Reply | Mahmood Elnasser | 02/09/10 12:02 |
| Reply | AP Charles | 02/09/10 23:25 |
| Like this | Oliver Sedlacek | 02/09/10 06:41 |
| This should work well | Richard Erlacher | 02/09/10 09:07 |
| The problem with the TLE2426 is... | Kai Klaas | 02/09/10 14:30 |
| quite true, that's why the op-amp is better | Richard Erlacher | 02/10/10 00:36 |
| Link.... | AP Charles | 02/10/10 00:37 |
| probably still too weak ... | Richard Erlacher | 02/10/10 23:38 |
...and instable... | Kai Klaas | 02/11/10 19:13 |
| True, opamp alternative | Oliver Sedlacek | 02/10/10 06:04 |
| There are several | Rob Klein | 02/10/10 11:57 |



