Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)


 

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
Jan Waclawek
03/02/10 03:58
Read: 113 times
Bratislava
Slovakia


 		 #173728 - why "never"?
Responding to: Andy Neil's previous message
Andy Neil said:
Isn't that always the trouble when you want something off-the-shelf?!

There's never anything that quite meets all of your requirements, and the time (ie, cost) that it takes to wade through all the close-but-no-cigar contenders ends up being more than it would've taken to design your own custom thingy.


If your requirements get close to "normal", whatever that might be, chances to get what you want increase.
You might get something in extra, but that might not be a trouble usually.

An example of this is the PC in its many incarnations - although it fits a different class of applications than discussed on this forum. I admit that in embedded the "normal" "class of applications" has a much wider meaning than in the PC-world.

Some three years ago I was using for a couple of purposes almost exactly the setup Eric was asking for. A small board, equipped with a uPSD3212 (a dual-UART 12-clocker), one UART went through a MAX232 (including RTS/CTS handshake lines), the other through an isolated RS485, with various on-board options (picked at time of assembly) for powering the isolated side. The uPSDs are natively ISP'd through JTAG, with all the consequences of this. As they are also IAP-able, I have developed an UART-bootloader for comfortable in-field update and a couple of other utilities. There was almost nothing else on the board, except some digital inputs/outputs circuitry and a FRAM for comfortable data logging (that could of course be not populated). I think this would fit perfectly Erik's needs. Whether I could persuade the company I was working for at that time to sell Erik some (plus the trouble of getting them across borders etc.) are all a different issue. But at the same time, we would be more than happy if we could buy those boards off-the-shelf, rather than waste time and energy for building them.

One of the boxes I am working on today is... an RS485/RS232 protocol converter enclosed in a DIN-rail box in a rather industrial style. That again might be meeting Eric's needs, except that it is not '51 based... ;-)

JW


List of 83 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
ready made board with 2 UARTs equipped ..      Erik Malund      01/27/10 09:00      
   Send me details      Joseph Hebert      01/27/10 19:27      
   SiLabs kit      Andy Neil      01/28/10 01:33      
      they don't, but      Erik Malund      01/28/10 04:50      
   Can you give more details ?      Kiran V. Sutar      01/28/10 04:17      
      if it was to be made, I need no assistance since ...      Erik Malund      01/28/10 04:46      
         ...and I thought Price was the issue...      Kiran V. Sutar      01/29/10 09:50      
   One Suggestion      Mahesh Joshi      02/03/10 08:05      
      the MX chips are being phased out      Erik Malund      02/03/10 08:27      
   I sent you email      Grant Beattie      02/03/10 15:46      
      read, answered, thanks      Erik Malund      02/03/10 18:25      
   you can use sm5964      Michael Ma      02/11/10 01:18      
      the idea was stated as...      Erik Malund      02/12/10 07:57      
         It is a suggestion      Michael Ma      02/27/10 22:09      
            Not a good idea      Andy Neil      02/28/10 01:11      
            that it is      Erik Malund      02/28/10 08:09      
   How about Phycore?      AP Charles      02/12/10 08:39      
      Legacy Product      Andy Neil      02/12/10 09:08      
         oh, yes      Erik Malund      02/12/10 09:42      
            Have a look at grifo      AP Charles      02/12/10 09:57      
   This looks good too      AP Charles      02/12/10 08:49      
   I've been wondering ...      Richard Erlacher      02/28/10 01:16      
      Likewise      Andy Neil      02/28/10 02:34      
         Maybe, but who makes 'em?      Richard Erlacher      02/28/10 09:38      
            8052 with only 1 UART      Andy Neil      02/28/10 11:15      
               I'm surprised, but that's the case!      Richard Erlacher      03/01/10 01:08      
                  why surprised?      Erik Malund      03/01/10 07:35      
                     That's what I thought      Andy Neil      03/01/10 07:49      
                     I never thought of it in those terms ...      Richard Erlacher      03/01/10 08:20      
                        comments      Erik Malund      03/01/10 08:47      
                           It could be done with two wires and 2-UART MCU      Richard Erlacher      03/01/10 12:41      
      120 devboards ...      Erik Malund      02/28/10 07:05      
         How difficult or costly would it be to add one?      Richard Erlacher      02/28/10 09:40      
            neither difficult nor costly      Erik Malund      02/28/10 18:31      
         SILABs 040 has 2 uarts on it      Marshall Brown      03/15/10 19:58      
   with ds89c450 or 430      JecksonS Ben      02/28/10 20:06      
      But that's a chip - not a board!      Andy Neil      03/01/10 01:50      
         cheap boards      JecksonS Ben      03/01/10 19:49      
            this is what's meant      Richard Erlacher      03/01/10 23:40      
               No RS485      Andy Neil      03/02/10 02:26      
                  Example      Andy Neil      03/02/10 03:35      
                     bad example      Jan Waclawek      03/02/10 04:02      
                        No - excellent example!      Andy Neil      03/02/10 05:29      
                           likewise with that other board ...      Richard Erlacher      03/02/10 10:01      
                           And did *you* know what are you looking for?      Jan Waclawek      03/02/10 13:30      
                              You got it      Andy Neil      03/02/10 14:34      
                  why "never"?      Jan Waclawek      03/02/10 03:58      
                     the PC's not the best example ...      Richard Erlacher      03/02/10 10:17      
                        PC as an example      Jan Waclawek      03/02/10 13:21      
                           Lots of toys ... little of any practical use.      Richard Erlacher      03/02/10 17:59      
                              Different tools can be used in different ways      Per Westermark      03/12/10 13:11      
                                 where is your head wedged?      Richard Erlacher      03/13/10 19:47      
                                    Don't blame the PC for solving wrong things with USB      Per Westermark      03/13/10 20:31      
                                       There are many things for which USB is unsuited      Richard Erlacher      03/14/10 19:32      
                                          Every change since 1980 isn't for the worse        Per Westermark      03/14/10 23:02      
                                             Maybe, but this one is      Richard Erlacher      03/15/10 12:00      
                                                again      Andy Peters      03/15/10 13:02      
                                                   Thta's what you say ...      Richard Erlacher      03/16/10 02:56      
                                                      that's what you always say      Andy Peters      03/16/10 12:04      
                                                         Where you sit determines what you see      Richard Erlacher      03/17/10 12:02      
                                                            Where did you sit?      Per Westermark      03/17/10 12:37      
                                                   SPI solves completely different problem than HDLC      Per Westermark      03/18/10 08:50      
                                                and again      Stefan KAnev      03/15/10 13:37      
                                                   what about the required size of the driver?      Richard Erlacher      03/16/10 02:48      
                                                      required size of driver      Stefan KAnev      03/16/10 07:32      
                                                         What do you mean by PCL Cost?      Richard Erlacher      03/17/10 12:04      
                                                            price difference between similar printers -      Stefan KAnev      03/17/10 13:16      
                                                Define narrow view - I see oportunities, i.e. the reverse      Per Westermark      03/15/10 13:42      
                                                   not relevant      Richard Erlacher      03/16/10 02:59      
                                                      So the Windows driver didn't list 8051 compatibility???      Per Westermark      03/16/10 03:47      
                                          I vote Richard as president for ...      Erik Malund      03/15/10 13:20      
                                             That's what one would expect from you, Erik      Richard Erlacher      03/16/10 03:00      
                              USB and fixed-rate transfer      Andy Peters      03/15/10 12:50      
                                 Fortunately, there's DOS ...      Richard Erlacher      03/16/10 03:07      
                        Linux - I thought as much      Andy Neil      03/03/10 01:07      
                        PCs        Andy Peters      03/15/10 12:48      
                           you forgot about LINUX      Richard Erlacher      03/16/10 03:20      
   By this time, anybody could have built one...      Kiran V. Sutar      03/02/10 03:11      
      Funnily enough, ...      Andy Neil      03/02/10 03:33      
      no      Erik Malund      03/02/10 08:06      
   I Hate to ask this....      Justin Fontes      03/13/10 01:44      
      A *very* common requirement!      Andy Neil      03/13/10 02:05      
      if indeed      Erik Malund      03/13/10 07:08      

Back to Subject List