| Andy Peters 03/16/10 12:04 Read: 137 times Tucson, Az USA |
#174209 - that's what you always say Responding to: Richard Erlacher's previous message |
Richard Erlacher said:
Andy Peters said:
Then use an FPGA and design EXACTLY what YOU want. Consider what that costs, Andy! Spartan 3AN50 is about five bucks. I dunno, it seems as if there's a ton of devices that communicate over SPI, which is a synchronous protocol and in many cases goes pretty damn fast. Really? So where would you find an SPI USRT that can process HDLC? Ya know, I haven't dealt with obsolete serial communications protocols in over a decade, so I'm really sorry if I haven't kept up with the parts available to handle them. I don't care what the PC's do. I want to know what can be done to make it, once again, into a useful tool for development. As I've noted in this thread, the PC IS a very useful development tool. You've stated your case, but haven't provided any supporting facts. Your reading comprehension is for shit. I reiterate again: a) I do VHDL design entry and simulation and FPGA synthesis and place and route on my Windows PC. b) I do microcontroller C and assembly language coding and compilation, and source-level debug on my Windows PC. c) I do schematic design entry and multilayer PCB layout and signal integrity simulation on my Windows PC. d) I read datasheets in PDF format on my Windows PC. In other words, my Windows machine is quite useful. So there are some supporting facts. As one wag once said, "you are entitled to your own opinion, but not your own facts." I'm surely glad I still have running DOS-based PC's. They work as PC's once did, and there's really nothing that can take their place. Please write a follow-up to this post using a DOS-based PC. Otherwise, enough with the trolling. -a |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| ready made board with 2 UARTs equipped .. | Erik Malund | 01/27/10 09:00 |
| Send me details | Joseph Hebert | 01/27/10 19:27 |
| SiLabs kit | Andy Neil | 01/28/10 01:33 |
| they don't, but | Erik Malund | 01/28/10 04:50 |
| Can you give more details ? | Kiran V. Sutar | 01/28/10 04:17 |
| if it was to be made, I need no assistance since ... | Erik Malund | 01/28/10 04:46 |
| ...and I thought Price was the issue... | Kiran V. Sutar | 01/29/10 09:50 |
| One Suggestion | Mahesh Joshi | 02/03/10 08:05 |
| the MX chips are being phased out | Erik Malund | 02/03/10 08:27 |
| I sent you email | Grant Beattie | 02/03/10 15:46 |
| read, answered, thanks | Erik Malund | 02/03/10 18:25 |
| you can use sm5964 | Michael Ma | 02/11/10 01:18 |
| the idea was stated as... | Erik Malund | 02/12/10 07:57 |
| It is a suggestion | Michael Ma | 02/27/10 22:09 |
| Not a good idea | Andy Neil | 02/28/10 01:11 |
| that it is | Erik Malund | 02/28/10 08:09 |
| How about Phycore? | AP Charles | 02/12/10 08:39 |
| Legacy Product | Andy Neil | 02/12/10 09:08 |
| oh, yes | Erik Malund | 02/12/10 09:42 |
| Have a look at grifo | AP Charles | 02/12/10 09:57 |
| This looks good too | AP Charles | 02/12/10 08:49 |
| I've been wondering ... | Richard Erlacher | 02/28/10 01:16 |
| Likewise | Andy Neil | 02/28/10 02:34 |
| Maybe, but who makes 'em? | Richard Erlacher | 02/28/10 09:38 |
| 8052 with only 1 UART | Andy Neil | 02/28/10 11:15 |
| I'm surprised, but that's the case! | Richard Erlacher | 03/01/10 01:08 |
| why surprised? | Erik Malund | 03/01/10 07:35 |
| That's what I thought | Andy Neil | 03/01/10 07:49 |
| I never thought of it in those terms ... | Richard Erlacher | 03/01/10 08:20 |
| comments | Erik Malund | 03/01/10 08:47 |
| It could be done with two wires and 2-UART MCU | Richard Erlacher | 03/01/10 12:41 |
| 120 devboards ... | Erik Malund | 02/28/10 07:05 |
| How difficult or costly would it be to add one? | Richard Erlacher | 02/28/10 09:40 |
| neither difficult nor costly | Erik Malund | 02/28/10 18:31 |
| SILABs 040 has 2 uarts on it | Marshall Brown | 03/15/10 19:58 |
| with ds89c450 or 430 | JecksonS Ben | 02/28/10 20:06 |
| But that's a chip - not a board! | Andy Neil | 03/01/10 01:50 |
| cheap boards | JecksonS Ben | 03/01/10 19:49 |
| this is what's meant | Richard Erlacher | 03/01/10 23:40 |
| No RS485 | Andy Neil | 03/02/10 02:26 |
| Example | Andy Neil | 03/02/10 03:35 |
| bad example | Jan Waclawek | 03/02/10 04:02 |
| No - excellent example! | Andy Neil | 03/02/10 05:29 |
| likewise with that other board ... | Richard Erlacher | 03/02/10 10:01 |
| And did *you* know what are you looking for? | Jan Waclawek | 03/02/10 13:30 |
| You got it | Andy Neil | 03/02/10 14:34 |
| why "never"? | Jan Waclawek | 03/02/10 03:58 |
| the PC's not the best example ... | Richard Erlacher | 03/02/10 10:17 |
| PC as an example | Jan Waclawek | 03/02/10 13:21 |
| Lots of toys ... little of any practical use. | Richard Erlacher | 03/02/10 17:59 |
| Different tools can be used in different ways | Per Westermark | 03/12/10 13:11 |
| where is your head wedged? | Richard Erlacher | 03/13/10 19:47 |
| Don't blame the PC for solving wrong things with USB | Per Westermark | 03/13/10 20:31 |
| There are many things for which USB is unsuited | Richard Erlacher | 03/14/10 19:32 |
| Every change since 1980 isn't for the worse | Per Westermark | 03/14/10 23:02 |
| Maybe, but this one is | Richard Erlacher | 03/15/10 12:00 |
| again | Andy Peters | 03/15/10 13:02 |
| Thta's what you say ... | Richard Erlacher | 03/16/10 02:56 |
| that's what you always say | Andy Peters | 03/16/10 12:04 |
| Where you sit determines what you see | Richard Erlacher | 03/17/10 12:02 |
| Where did you sit? | Per Westermark | 03/17/10 12:37 |
SPI solves completely different problem than HDLC | Per Westermark | 03/18/10 08:50 |
| and again | Stefan KAnev | 03/15/10 13:37 |
| what about the required size of the driver? | Richard Erlacher | 03/16/10 02:48 |
| required size of driver | Stefan KAnev | 03/16/10 07:32 |
| What do you mean by PCL Cost? | Richard Erlacher | 03/17/10 12:04 |
| price difference between similar printers - | Stefan KAnev | 03/17/10 13:16 |
| Define narrow view - I see oportunities, i.e. the reverse | Per Westermark | 03/15/10 13:42 |
| not relevant | Richard Erlacher | 03/16/10 02:59 |
| So the Windows driver didn't list 8051 compatibility??? | Per Westermark | 03/16/10 03:47 |
| I vote Richard as president for ... | Erik Malund | 03/15/10 13:20 |
| That's what one would expect from you, Erik | Richard Erlacher | 03/16/10 03:00 |
| USB and fixed-rate transfer | Andy Peters | 03/15/10 12:50 |
| Fortunately, there's DOS ... | Richard Erlacher | 03/16/10 03:07 |
| Linux - I thought as much | Andy Neil | 03/03/10 01:07 |
| PCs | Andy Peters | 03/15/10 12:48 |
| you forgot about LINUX | Richard Erlacher | 03/16/10 03:20 |
| By this time, anybody could have built one... | Kiran V. Sutar | 03/02/10 03:11 |
| Funnily enough, ... | Andy Neil | 03/02/10 03:33 |
| no | Erik Malund | 03/02/10 08:06 |
| I Hate to ask this.... | Justin Fontes | 03/13/10 01:44 |
| A *very* common requirement! | Andy Neil | 03/13/10 02:05 |
| if indeed | Erik Malund | 03/13/10 07:08 |



