| Andy Neil 03/22/10 07:16 Read: 135 times Basingstoke Uk |
#174399 - Don't you think it's a bit late for that?! Responding to: Anurag Mishra's previous message |
The OP didn't even reply to such requests while the thread was active - what chance is there now that there's been no activity at all for over two months?!
Anurag Mishra said:
There are basically two ways,
1. Protocol based comm. (one/two way) Everything must involve a protocol! 2. Let 8051(a) dump data in EEPROM and 8051(b) read it. Not at the same time !!! The "protocol" is the set of "rules" that defines how to ensure that they don't both read/write at the same time! But why specifically EEPROM? The approach could gnerally use any kind of "shared memory". |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Connecting two 8051s | Poonam Kothawade | 01/08/10 01:31 |
| ther are lots of interfaces | Neil Kurzman | 01/08/10 01:58 |
| "RS232" (sic?) | Andy Neil | 01/08/10 02:25 |
| That is why i said type | Neil Kurzman | 01/08/10 18:08 |
| a slight difference of opinion | Erik Malund | 01/08/10 07:43 |
| I'm (probably) with Neil | Andy Neil | 01/08/10 08:35 |
| I do not, specifically if ... | Erik Malund | 01/08/10 08:50 |
| I thought you'd like that! | Andy Neil | 01/08/10 09:33 |
| I was looking from a code point of veiw | Neil Kurzman | 01/08/10 18:14 |
| if one was the best there would only be one. | Andy Neil | 01/09/10 03:38 |
| yes and no | Erik Malund | 01/09/10 07:41 |
| Lots of interfaces - Microwire; SPI; I2C | Andy Neil | 01/08/10 08:31 |
| parallel? | Maarten Brock | 01/10/10 04:01 |
| You may use whatever you like! | Andy Neil | 01/08/10 02:18 |
| I2C is serial communication. | Richard Erlacher | 01/08/10 09:44 |
| Already noted | Andy Neil | 01/08/10 10:50 |
| Sorry ... didn't mean to steal your thunder ... | Richard Erlacher | 01/08/10 12:49 |
| Is this (question) a Joke ...??? | Kiran V. Sutar | 01/09/10 12:25 |
| Very tired of the "depends" response | Justin Fontes | 01/10/10 00:41 |
| Agreed...but this happens always... | Kiran V. Sutar | 01/10/10 01:21 |
I think you missed the point!  | Andy Neil | 01/10/10 02:41 |
| Re: 'Depends'.. | Gopal Amlekar | 01/10/10 06:53 |
| it's typical ... | Richard Erlacher | 01/10/10 08:18 |
| All too common! | Andy Neil | 01/10/10 08:52 |
| FAQ isn't easy - flowchart not adequate | Per Westermark | 01/10/10 07:12 |
| Exactly! | Andy Neil | 01/10/10 08:50 |
| You wouldn't do it in everyday life - so why do it here?! | Andy Neil | 01/10/10 09:00 |
| Concrete enough? | Kai Klaas | 01/10/10 13:31 |
| Wow! | Andy Neil | 01/10/10 16:28 |
| Yes, for a while... | Kai Klaas | 01/11/10 08:42 |
| Well.. is this pretty good? | Justin Fontes | 01/11/10 21:15 |
| Still missing the point? | Andy Neil | 01/12/10 03:41 |
| Youre missing my point | Justin Fontes | 01/12/10 10:48 |
| Exactly!! | Kai Klaas | 01/12/10 11:12 |
| I see - but disagree | Andy Neil | 01/12/10 11:21 |
| not 'demanding' but 'asking' is encouraged | Erik Malund | 01/12/10 11:35 |
| Still often not possible to help... | Per Westermark | 01/12/10 17:45 |
| I agree Justin..but... | Kiran V. Sutar | 01/13/10 04:09 |
| Lots of usage details possible without giving product away | Per Westermark | 01/13/10 08:29 |
| My answer was to be quiet! | Kai Klaas | 01/13/10 08:35 |
| I will admit.... | Justin Fontes | 01/13/10 11:38 |
| That's why folks should search before posting! | Richard Erlacher | 01/13/10 12:21 |
| Please provide more details... | Anurag Mishra | 03/22/10 07:06 |
Don't you think it's a bit late for that?! | Andy Neil | 03/22/10 07:16 |