| Erik Malund 08/13/10 07:42 Read: 531 times Mt Airy, Nc USA |
#177984 - the "interrupt priority list" |
A post in another thered made me wonder. Has anyone ever had a reason to take the "interrupt priority list" into consideration ?
I never have and would like to know if anyone has and why from 'the bible" Note that the “priority within level” structure is only used to resolve simultaneous requests of the same priority level. This seems to be a common source of misunderstandings Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| the "interrupt priority list" | Erik Malund | 08/13/10 07:42 |
| latency calculation | Jan Waclawek | 08/13/10 10:49 |
| but | Erik Malund | 08/13/10 10:53 |
| Do I understand this correctly... | Robert Revens | 08/13/10 11:17 |
| priority (IP) and 'polling sequence" (the chip) | Erik Malund | 08/13/10 11:36 |
| how to interpret "interrupts occuring at the same time | Jan Waclawek | 08/13/10 12:57 |
| sequence can't be influenced | Jan Waclawek | 08/13/10 13:01 |
| no, it is 'random' because .. | Erik Malund | 08/13/10 14:28 |
latency calculation | Jan Waclawek | 08/14/10 02:00 |