| Per Westermark 09/12/11 02:28 Modified: 09/12/11 02:32 Read: 1230 times Sweden Msg Score: +1 +1 Good Question |
#183712 - Bit-configurable transceiver chips |
What alternatives exists if there is a need to have a 3V3 processor drive 5V signals on a ribbon cable, where the signals must be buffered and reach speeds of up to 5MHz, but it isn't known beforehand which signals are inputs and which are outputs?
Are there any chips similar to 74HCT245 etc, but with each signal having individual configuration of data direction, so the chip starts in tristate or input mode, and then allowing the processor to set up the correct configuration based on what equipment is connected on the ribbon cable? I kind of think there was a thread about similar buffer chips earlier, but can't seem to locate it. Edit: Oops - did intend thread for chat board. Edit: Seems to be this thread - but the Maxim chip was suitable for low-speed signals, since it doesn't allow direct pin access. http://old.8052.com/forum/read.phtml?id=179008 |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Bit-configurable transceiver chips | Per Westermark | 09/12/11 02:28 |
| Suggesting....again... | Michael Karas | 09/12/11 05:35 |
| Alas 5V needed and ribbon cables are a bit "rough" | Per Westermark | 09/12/11 06:54 |
| Another Suggestion.... | Michael Karas | 09/12/11 05:59 |
| level translator | Jan Waclawek | 09/12/11 06:21 |
| Alas, "weak output drive" and no input hysterese | Per Westermark | 09/12/11 07:30 |
| TI sn74gtl2010 | Stefan KAnev | 09/17/11 02:18 |
| or NXP GTL2010,GTL2000 | Stefan KAnev | 09/19/11 01:24 |
| looks promising | Richard Erlacher | 09/21/11 22:29 |
| NXP GTL20xx -> NVT20xx | Jan Waclawek | 10/04/11 00:57 |
| Need to read more to understand them | Per Westermark | 09/20/11 02:04 |
| looks like the cat's miauw | Erik Malund | 09/21/11 07:45 |
| NXP has .... | Erik Malund | 09/12/11 13:28 |
| I2C or SPI just can't get even close to the huge bandwidth | Per Westermark | 09/12/11 14:01 |
| nope, no I²C clocks | Erik Malund | 09/12/11 14:21 |
| extender, not expander | Per Westermark | 09/12/11 14:37 |
| I have been wondering this myself | Justin Fontes | 09/12/11 16:18 |
| Supported capacitance seems to be the snag | Per Westermark | 09/12/11 17:23 |
| Differential SPI | Jez Smith | 09/16/11 09:39 |
| Serial -> buffers on adapter boards is a potential solution | Per Westermark | 09/16/11 14:41 |
| Have you considered programmable logic? | Richard Erlacher | 09/19/11 14:08 |
| I had suggested this as well | Michael Karas | 09/19/11 14:33 |
| Yes ... I remember that ... | Richard Erlacher | 09/19/11 23:43 |
| Long life | Per Westermark | 09/20/11 01:59 |
| They seem to live a long time ... | Richard Erlacher | 09/20/11 09:22 |
| Adapters | Per Westermark | 09/20/11 10:16 |
| These aren't necessarily so "huge" | Richard Erlacher | 09/20/11 19:52 |
| Not huge in size | Per Westermark | 09/21/11 01:49 |
| Some of them can handle that. | Richard Erlacher | 09/21/11 22:34 |
| Yes and no | Per Westermark | 09/22/11 04:53 |
| There are ways ... | Richard Erlacher | 09/22/11 10:55 |
| Body diodes | Per Westermark | 09/22/11 16:39 |
| serial termination ... | Erik Malund | 09/23/11 07:36 |
| Yes, current- and bandwidth-limiting components used | Per Westermark | 09/23/11 08:25 |
| you youing whippersnappers, pay attention | Erik Malund | 09/23/11 11:45 |
| pedantry, again | Andy Peters | 09/20/11 11:13 |
| What would YOU suggest? | Richard Erlacher | 09/20/11 19:45 |
| Here's a thought ... | Richard Erlacher | 10/17/11 03:03 |
| Probably | Per Westermark | 10/17/11 15:51 |
I'd sugest you consider older CPLD's | Richard Erlacher | 10/17/11 19:14 |



