Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
Matthias Arndt
12/04/11 08:09
Read: 569 times
Friedrichshafen
Germany


 
#185014 - I personally don't need full C99 compliance
Responding to: Per Westermark's previous message
...but the really useful and backward compatible stuff like the headers stdint.h and stdbool.h would help alot. Same goes for the possibilty to declare variables within blocks, basically any location within a function and ofcourse the keyword inline.

I don't see any feature there that would fail on a 8051. SDCC does it, so can do Keil, esp as their compiler really is great in all other aspects.

List of 13 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
stdint.h for Keil C?      Matthias Arndt      12/03/11 11:38      
   ! StdInt.h      Michael Karas      12/03/11 12:42      
      Make one        Per Westermark      12/03/11 15:11      
         Ofcourse      Matthias Arndt      12/04/11 01:51      
            SDCC's headers can be adapted      Matthias Arndt      12/04/11 02:25      
               That's the problem...      Andy Neil      12/05/11 14:29      
   So just write one!      Andy Neil      12/03/11 17:05      
   Does Keil claim C99 compliance at all?      Jan Waclawek      12/04/11 01:45      
      They have a statement on this...      Matthias Arndt      12/04/11 02:21      
         C90 conformance - not C99.      Per Westermark      12/04/11 05:32      
            I personally don't need full C99 compliance      Matthias Arndt      12/04/11 08:09      
               Yes possible. But maybe not economical.      Per Westermark      12/04/11 09:06      
               Not difficult      Andy Neil      12/04/11 14:36      

Back to Subject List