Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
Erik Malund
01/23/12 06:40
Read: 534 times
Mt Airy, Nc
USA


 
#185635 - new '51 derivatives appearing monthly
Responding to: ???'s previous message
"Why would you want to use that family? It's so old/outdated."
if so, why are new '51 derivatives appearing monthly
if so, why are e.g. IR using the ;51 core for their recently introduced motor controllers

Me personally, I think the pin out is a very convenient pin out and the instruction set makes coding them in assembly a breeze compared to that of a PIC microcontroller.
the pinout does not matter but, for a number of applications, the instruction set does

When there are "more modern/updated" uC's on the market with on chip oscillators, more on chip peripherals, higher I/O source/sink capability, etc etc...why is the MCS-51 family still your preferred uC family of choice?
if you have a look at e.g. the SILabs f12x series you will see that "with on chip oscillators, more on chip peripherals, higher I/O source/sink capability, etc etc" does not hold water.

I am, currently using the ARM when that is the best choice and the '51 when that is the best choice, which, basically, end up as a project size question.

Erik

PS the PIG instruction set is atrocious.


List of 14 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Why is the MCS-51 family your uC family of preference?      Jon Wilder      01/22/12 12:30      
   My Choice      Michael Karas      01/22/12 13:06      
   Just a question of preferences      Per Westermark      01/22/12 13:09      
   It's the instruction set ...      Richard Erlacher      01/22/12 18:38      
   new '51 derivatives appearing monthly      Erik Malund      01/23/12 06:40      
      Instruction Set        Michael Karas      01/23/12 08:07      
         Forgot one!      Rob Klein      01/23/12 14:19      
         The PIC is as Old as the 8051      Neil Kurzman      01/23/12 14:31      
            AVR is hardly "new" in semiconductor terms...      Andy Neil      01/23/12 16:47      
            It may be older ...      Richard Erlacher      01/23/12 23:30      
               indeed it is..      Valentin Angelovski      01/24/12 01:19      
   a questionaire from the past      Jan Waclawek      01/23/12 13:30      
   Why is it my preference?      Valentin Angelovski      01/23/12 19:54      
   why?      Andy Peters      01/24/12 10:11      

Back to Subject List