Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
Andy Peters
01/24/12 10:11
Read: 461 times
Tucson, Az
USA


 
#185653 - why?
Responding to: ???'s previous message
a) We have the entire toolchain (compiler, JTAG debugger, etc) and it's paid for itself.

b) Years of experience using the device family.

c) They do what we need them to do, without fuss.

-a

List of 14 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Why is the MCS-51 family your uC family of preference?      Jon Wilder      01/22/12 12:30      
   My Choice      Michael Karas      01/22/12 13:06      
   Just a question of preferences      Per Westermark      01/22/12 13:09      
   It's the instruction set ...      Richard Erlacher      01/22/12 18:38      
   new '51 derivatives appearing monthly      Erik Malund      01/23/12 06:40      
      Instruction Set        Michael Karas      01/23/12 08:07      
         Forgot one!      Rob Klein      01/23/12 14:19      
         The PIC is as Old as the 8051      Neil Kurzman      01/23/12 14:31      
            AVR is hardly "new" in semiconductor terms...      Andy Neil      01/23/12 16:47      
            It may be older ...      Richard Erlacher      01/23/12 23:30      
               indeed it is..      Valentin Angelovski      01/24/12 01:19      
   a questionaire from the past      Jan Waclawek      01/23/12 13:30      
   Why is it my preference?      Valentin Angelovski      01/23/12 19:54      
   why?      Andy Peters      01/24/12 10:11      

Back to Subject List