| Andy Peters 01/24/12 10:11 Read: 203 times Tucson, Az USA |
#185653 - why? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
a) We have the entire toolchain (compiler, JTAG debugger, etc) and it's paid for itself.
b) Years of experience using the device family. c) They do what we need them to do, without fuss. -a |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Why is the MCS-51 family your uC family of preference? | Jon Wilder | 01/22/12 12:30 |
| My Choice | Michael Karas | 01/22/12 13:06 |
| Just a question of preferences | Per Westermark | 01/22/12 13:09 |
| It's the instruction set ... | Richard Erlacher | 01/22/12 18:38 |
| new '51 derivatives appearing monthly | Erik Malund | 01/23/12 06:40 |
Instruction Set  | Michael Karas | 01/23/12 08:07 |
| Forgot one! | Rob Klein | 01/23/12 14:19 |
| The PIC is as Old as the 8051 | Neil Kurzman | 01/23/12 14:31 |
| AVR is hardly "new" in semiconductor terms... | Andy Neil | 01/23/12 16:47 |
| It may be older ... | Richard Erlacher | 01/23/12 23:30 |
| indeed it is.. | Valentin Angelovski | 01/24/12 01:19 |
| a questionaire from the past | Jan Waclawek | 01/23/12 13:30 |
| Why is it my preference? | Valentin Angelovski | 01/23/12 19:54 |
why? | Andy Peters | 01/24/12 10:11 |