Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
Per Westermark
06/11/12 11:55
Read: 777 times

#187668 - You have already been given suggestions
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Mandeep Singh said:
[...] other saying remove the delays

Where have you seen anyone saying you should remove the delay?

You got information about how to perform debugging, even without a digital oscilloscope. And one of the things mentioned in that post was how to verify that your delay actually produces a reasonable delay. That is not (!!!) the same as saying that you should remove the delay.

And you was told that busy-loop delays have big issues since they depend much on the compiler. So some compilers will generate faster code. Some will generate slower code. And some compilers will optimize away the delay completely.

anyways, the real problem is of timing only...and i don't have oscilloscope

So - was was your reaction when I did post specifically how to test the delays in a way that didn't require an oscilloscope? Have you spent any time testing the suggested method yet?

so whats your suggestion...??

The same as before - right now, we are waiting for feedback from you based on already given suggestions...

By the way "...??" is five characters. Proper use is one or three terminating characters. ".", "!", "?", "...", "!!!", "???" or in some situations a mixture like "??!"

List of 20 messages in thread
help me with 93c46 and at89s52---MikroC      Mandeep Singh      06/03/12 16:29      
   What You Need to Do Yourself        Michael Karas      06/03/12 17:33      
      need help - 93c46 using AT89s52 - mikroc      Mandeep Singh      06/09/12 04:59      
         MikroC is unwise choice      David Prentice      06/09/12 09:34      
   help me with 93c46 and at89s52---MikroC      Mandeep Singh      06/09/12 05:01      
      So check without scope - adjust code until testable      Per Westermark      06/09/12 06:04      
         you have now 3 times asked help with 93c46/at89s52--MikroC      Erik Malund      06/11/12 07:36      
            93c46/at89s52--MikroC      Mandeep Singh      06/11/12 10:36      
               my suggestion      Erik Malund      06/11/12 11:27      
               You have already been given suggestions      Per Westermark      06/11/12 11:55      
                  help me with 93c46 and at89s52---MikroC      Mandeep Singh      06/12/12 08:33      
                     Use a proper Compiler      David Prentice      06/12/12 08:42      
                        I wanna, I wanna, I wanna,      Erik Malund      06/12/12 09:15      
                     Time to actually prove your logic and your delays      Per Westermark      06/12/12 09:21      
                        ----thanks all for helping out      Mandeep Singh      06/12/12 10:54      
                           do you REALLY expect ....      Erik Malund      06/12/12 11:29      
                     If you can't get MikroC to work ...      Richard Erlacher      06/12/12 15:25      
                        switching to keil      Mandeep Singh      06/13/12 14:32      
                           Example code on this website      David Prentice      06/13/12 15:05      
                           why, oh why      Erik Malund      06/13/12 18:06      

Back to Subject List