Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
Daniel Jenkins
02/27/13 20:28
Read: 826 times
Palmdale
United States


 
#189504 - Increasing accuarcy
Responding to: Jim Granville's previous message
No need for lasers at the start line. The starting line clock is simply a display of the finish line laser's clock. They are electronically set simultaneously in one physical location, then one transported to the start line as simply a display. If I wait 30 seconds after my specified minute, so what. I'll just need to average a slightly higher speed. My actual goal is to cross the finish line on time, not to hold a perfect moving average. There is no trigger at the start line. You get a designated starting time and are scored by your difference between your designated start time and actual finish time as recorded by breaking the beam.

As to your secnd question, they do not allow external timers or triggers as you have mentioned. all timing wust be manually controlled. These guys are winning with stopwatches and timers manually activated on the fly. I can manually resynchronize my setup , but I'll have to do it by sight and manual trigger. I can, as stated in a previous part of this post, measure out a fixed distance to a landmark on the last straight 3 mile stretch and hit a button that will automatically adjust my counter to what it SHOULD be at that point, whatever that calculates out to be.

List of 19 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Looking for direction - racing application      Daniel Jenkins      02/22/13 23:46      
   step by step      Erik Malund      02/23/13 06:29      
      First step...      Daniel Jenkins      02/23/13 11:20      
         well, you are new      Erik Malund      02/23/13 13:08      
         First, check number sizes and precisions       Jim Granville      02/23/13 15:51      
            Good catch on the clock accuracy.      Daniel Jenkins      02/24/13 01:10      
               Judging      J. Guy      02/25/13 11:17      
                  Judging      Daniel Jenkins      02/26/13 12:25      
                     Rethink your solution      J. Guy      02/27/13 11:04      
                        Not sure we're seeing eye to eye...      Daniel Jenkins      02/27/13 20:16      
                     think precision       Jim Granville      02/27/13 13:44      
                        Increasing accuarcy      Daniel Jenkins      02/27/13 20:28      
                           Precision still matters.      Jim Granville      02/28/13 02:17      
            Precision distance!      Oliver Sedlacek      02/28/13 05:09      
               Rulebook on timing      Daniel Jenkins      02/28/13 11:37      
                  They have a serious system      Jim Granville      02/28/13 13:09      
   very imprecise      Erik Malund      02/28/13 13:37      
      re:      Jacob Boyce      02/28/13 14:52      
         re: speed      Daniel Jenkins      02/28/13 16:45      

Back to Subject List