| Erik Malund 07/08/03 14:28 Read: 442 times Mt Airy, Nc USA |
#50294 - RE: DAQ card isolation Responding to: ???'s previous message |
If I want to isolate my cards (galvanic),then is it necessary isolation between analog input section(amplifier and ADC) and microcontroller section and
RS485 bus??(between three parts) Or is it enough to isolate between analog section + micro and rs485 bus?? Both the uC and the RS-485 are digital, thus no 'isolation' is required (I am talking about separate ground planes etc). If the difference (spikes and permanent) between ground at point a and ground at point b is no more than your 485 transciever can handle as common mode (see dataasheet) use a 'normal' 485 transciever. If it is more, Maxim has isolated 485 transcievers that, as far as I remember, can handle +-60V common mode (see www-maxim-ic.com ) Under no circumstances will you need to 'isolate' (in any way) between your uC and the 485 transciever. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| DAQ card isolation | Parviz Parvizi | 07/05/03 13:21 |
| RE: DAQ card isolation | Jez Smith | 07/05/03 14:54 |
| RE: DAQ card isolation | Raghunathan R | 07/05/03 20:46 |
| Why galvanic isolation? | Kai Klaas | 07/06/03 02:02 |
| RE: Why galvanic isolation? | Parviz Parvizi | 07/06/03 09:09 |
| RE: Why galvanic isolation? | Erik Malund | 07/07/03 08:58 |
| RE: Why galvanic isolation? | Parviz Parvizi | 07/13/03 05:55 |
| RE: Why galvanic isolation? | Kai Klaas | 07/13/03 22:20 |
| RE: Why galvanic isolation? | Terry Lingle | 07/14/03 00:52 |
| RE: Why galvanic isolation? | Kai Klaas | 07/14/03 04:09 |
| RE: Why galvanic isolation? | Terry Lingle | 07/14/03 10:35 |
| RE: Why galvanic isolation? | Kai Klaas | 07/14/03 14:43 |
| RE: Why galvanic isolation? | Dave Nelson | 07/16/03 10:53 |
RE: Why galvanic isolation? | Terry Lingle | 07/16/03 11:38 |
| RE: DAQ card isolation | Kai Klaas | 07/07/03 20:45 |
| RE: DAQ card isolation | Parviz Parvizi | 07/08/03 14:03 |
| RE: DAQ card isolation | Erik Malund | 07/08/03 14:28 |
| RE: DAQ card isolation | Kai Klaas | 07/09/03 01:09 |
| RE: DAQ card isolation, Kai | Erik Malund | 07/09/03 08:05 |
| RE: DAQ card isolation, Kai | Parviz Parvizi | 07/09/03 14:23 |
| RE: DAQ card isolation, Kai | Erik Malund | 07/09/03 14:31 |
| RE: DAQ card isolation, Kai | Raghunathan R | 07/10/03 01:29 |
| RE: DAQ card isolation, Kai | Erik Malund | 07/10/03 08:21 |
| RE: DAQ card isolation, Erik | Raghunathan R | 07/11/03 11:22 |
| More detailed schematic | Kai Klaas | 07/10/03 23:18 |
| RE: More detailed schematic, Kai | Erik Malund | 07/11/03 08:35 |
| RE: More detailed schematic, Kai | Kai Klaas | 07/11/03 13:22 |
| RE: More detailed schematic, Kai | Erik Malund | 07/11/03 13:50 |
| RE: More detailed schematic, Kai | Kai Klaas | 07/11/03 15:30 |
| RE: DAQ card isolation | Parviz Parvizi | 07/11/03 14:06 |
| RE: DAQ card isolation | Erik Malund | 07/11/03 14:43 |
| RE: DAQ card isolation | Kai Klaas | 07/12/03 03:13 |
| RE: DAQ card isolation | Parviz Parvizi | 07/12/03 10:36 |
| I am very unhappy! | Kai Klaas | 07/12/03 13:26 |
| RE: I am very unhappy! | Rob Redding | 07/12/03 16:03 |
| RE: I am very unhappy! | Kai Klaas | 07/12/03 18:14 |
| RE: I am very unhappy! | Raghunathan R | 07/12/03 22:12 |
| No more unhappy | Kai Klaas | 07/12/03 22:44 |
| RE: No more unhappy | Michael Karas | 07/12/03 23:26 |
| RE: No more unhappy | Kai Klaas | 07/13/03 02:58 |
| RE: No more unhappy | Erik Malund | 07/14/03 17:02 |
| RE: I am very unhappy! | Parviz Parvizi | 07/13/03 05:39 |
| I say you need isolation at BOTH ends! | Michael Karas | 07/12/03 18:13 |
| RE: I say you need isolation at BOTH ends! | Parviz Parvizi | 07/14/03 05:39 |
| RE: I say you need isolation at BOTH ends! | Erik Malund | 07/14/03 17:00 |
| RE: DAQ card isolation | Erik Malund | 07/11/03 16:31 |
| RE: DAQ card isolation | Kai Klaas | 07/12/03 00:30 |



