Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
Kai Klaas
07/11/03 15:30
Read: 516 times
Germany


 
#50512 - RE: More detailed schematic, Kai
Responding to: Erik Malund's previous message
Even if it's part of specifications, for me it's totally stupid to use an interfacing technique, which generates common mode interference by design. And it heavily violates concept of saftey earth connections, because then you are not allowed to make any earth connections at recievers! That's really stupid. Why not using voltage generators (0...10V) when wanting to connect more than one reciever? This would be much easier, and no additional common mode signal is generated.

For me the only good reason to use 4...20mA technique is, that it supports two-wire transmitter technique. Means, you can route power supply and signal by the help of only two wires. XTR100 from Burr-Brown is a good example. Use it with 500R shunt resistance and without chaining, and of course, make a earth connection to signal ground.

Our products exhibit symmetrical signal routing (signal voltage of +-10V). When we use current sources we forbidd 'chaining' and recievers have shunt resistors of 500R.

Kai

List of 47 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
DAQ card isolation      Parviz Parvizi      07/05/03 13:21      
   RE: DAQ card isolation      Jez Smith      07/05/03 14:54      
   RE: DAQ card isolation      Raghunathan R      07/05/03 20:46      
   Why galvanic isolation?      Kai Klaas      07/06/03 02:02      
      RE: Why galvanic isolation?      Parviz Parvizi      07/06/03 09:09      
         RE: Why galvanic isolation?      Erik Malund      07/07/03 08:58      
      RE: Why galvanic isolation?      Parviz Parvizi      07/13/03 05:55      
         RE: Why galvanic isolation?      Kai Klaas      07/13/03 22:20      
            RE: Why galvanic isolation?      Terry Lingle      07/14/03 00:52      
               RE: Why galvanic isolation?      Kai Klaas      07/14/03 04:09      
                  RE: Why galvanic isolation?      Terry Lingle      07/14/03 10:35      
                     RE: Why galvanic isolation?      Kai Klaas      07/14/03 14:43      
                     RE: Why galvanic isolation?      Dave Nelson      07/16/03 10:53      
                        RE: Why galvanic isolation?      Terry Lingle      07/16/03 11:38      
   RE: DAQ card isolation      Kai Klaas      07/07/03 20:45      
      RE: DAQ card isolation      Parviz Parvizi      07/08/03 14:03      
         RE: DAQ card isolation      Erik Malund      07/08/03 14:28      
         RE: DAQ card isolation      Kai Klaas      07/09/03 01:09      
            RE: DAQ card isolation, Kai      Erik Malund      07/09/03 08:05      
               RE: DAQ card isolation, Kai      Parviz Parvizi      07/09/03 14:23      
                  RE: DAQ card isolation, Kai      Erik Malund      07/09/03 14:31      
               RE: DAQ card isolation, Kai      Raghunathan R      07/10/03 01:29      
                  RE: DAQ card isolation, Kai      Erik Malund      07/10/03 08:21      
                     RE: DAQ card isolation, Erik      Raghunathan R      07/11/03 11:22      
            More detailed schematic      Kai Klaas      07/10/03 23:18      
               RE: More detailed schematic, Kai      Erik Malund      07/11/03 08:35      
                  RE: More detailed schematic, Kai      Kai Klaas      07/11/03 13:22      
                     RE: More detailed schematic, Kai      Erik Malund      07/11/03 13:50      
                        RE: More detailed schematic, Kai      Kai Klaas      07/11/03 15:30      
   RE: DAQ card isolation      Parviz Parvizi      07/11/03 14:06      
      RE: DAQ card isolation      Erik Malund      07/11/03 14:43      
      RE: DAQ card isolation      Kai Klaas      07/12/03 03:13      
         RE: DAQ card isolation      Parviz Parvizi      07/12/03 10:36      
            I am very unhappy!      Kai Klaas      07/12/03 13:26      
               RE: I am very unhappy!      Rob Redding      07/12/03 16:03      
                  RE: I am very unhappy!      Kai Klaas      07/12/03 18:14      
               RE: I am very unhappy!      Raghunathan R      07/12/03 22:12      
                  No more unhappy      Kai Klaas      07/12/03 22:44      
                     RE: No more unhappy      Michael Karas      07/12/03 23:26      
                        RE: No more unhappy      Kai Klaas      07/13/03 02:58      
                           RE: No more unhappy      Erik Malund      07/14/03 17:02      
               RE: I am very unhappy!      Parviz Parvizi      07/13/03 05:39      
            I say you need isolation at BOTH ends!      Michael Karas      07/12/03 18:13      
               RE: I say you need isolation at BOTH ends!      Parviz Parvizi      07/14/03 05:39      
                  RE: I say you need isolation at BOTH ends!      Erik Malund      07/14/03 17:00      
   RE: DAQ card isolation      Erik Malund      07/11/03 16:31      
      RE: DAQ card isolation      Kai Klaas      07/12/03 00:30      

Back to Subject List