Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)


 

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
Andy Neil
05/21/04 11:59
Read: 470 times
Basingstoke
Uk


 		 #70869 - RE: MMU
Responding to: Steve M. Taylor's previous message
Steve M. Taylor said:
AFAIK No MMU means no Linux.

From the ucLinux site (link provided by Narasimha Rao):

"uClinux is a derivative of Linux 2.0 kernel intended for microcontrollers without Memory Management Units (MMUs)."

http://www.uclinux.org/description/

However, it boasts the following resource requirements as "much, much smaller than the original Linux 2.0 kernel:"

  • uCkernel < 512 kb
  • uCkernel + tools < 900 kb

- and that's just the Kernel!
Still not a job for an 8051 then

List of 26 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
8051 and Lynix      Shahzad Aslam      05/21/04 07:14      
   RE: 8051 and Lynix      Jez Smith      05/21/04 07:28      
   Why?      Andy Neil      05/21/04 08:23      
      RE: What?      Erik Malund      05/21/04 08:26      
         RE: What?      Donald Catto      05/21/04 08:49      
            8051 and linux      Narasimha Rao      05/21/04 09:56      
               Typo?      Andy Neil      05/21/04 11:53      
                  RE: Typo?      Donald Catto      05/21/04 12:24      
                     RE: Lynix      Andy Neil      05/21/04 12:25      
   RE: 8051 and Lynix      Steve M. Taylor      05/21/04 10:33      
      RE: MMU      Andy Neil      05/21/04 11:59      
         RE: MMU      Donald Catto      05/21/04 12:27      
            RE: ...and then what?      Andy Neil      05/21/04 13:19      
               RE: ...and then what?      Bartosz Wucke      05/21/04 21:55      
                  the mind of a typical Linux geek      Andy Neil      05/21/04 22:08      
   RE: 8051 and Lynix      Bartosz Wucke      05/21/04 21:49      
      Lynix? Linux?      Andy Neil      05/21/04 22:10      
         RE: Lynix? Linux?      Bartosz Wucke      05/24/04 15:01      
   It was Linux      Shahzad Aslam      05/22/04 03:19      
   WHY?!      Andy Neil      05/22/04 07:15      
      RE: WHY?!      Erik Malund      05/22/04 12:23      
         RE: WHY?!      Andy Neil      05/22/04 17:46      
      RE: WHY?!      Andy Neil      05/22/04 18:06      
   Conclusion and why Linux      Shahzad Aslam      05/23/04 05:57      
      RE: Conclusion and why Linux      Dan Henry      05/23/04 12:44      
         RE: Dan Henry      Shahzad Aslam      05/24/04 03:47      

Back to Subject List