| ??? 05/21/04 12:27 Read: 561 times |
#70875 - RE: MMU Responding to: Andy Neil's previous message |
"Still not a job for an 8051 then"
Having read a few bits and pieces on that site the conclusion seems to be that it *would* be possible to implement Linux on the 8051 but you'd have to be very stupid, very clever and very patient all at the same time. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| 8051 and Lynix | Shahzad Aslam | 05/21/04 07:14 |
| RE: 8051 and Lynix | Jez Smith | 05/21/04 07:28 |
| Why? | Andy Neil | 05/21/04 08:23 |
| RE: What? | Erik Malund | 05/21/04 08:26 |
| RE: What? | Donald Catto | 05/21/04 08:49 |
| 8051 and linux | Narasimha Rao | 05/21/04 09:56 |
| Typo? | Andy Neil | 05/21/04 11:53 |
| RE: Typo? | Donald Catto | 05/21/04 12:24 |
| RE: Lynix | Andy Neil | 05/21/04 12:25 |
| RE: 8051 and Lynix | Steve M. Taylor | 05/21/04 10:33 |
| RE: MMU | Andy Neil | 05/21/04 11:59 |
| RE: MMU | Donald Catto | 05/21/04 12:27 |
| RE: ...and then what? | Andy Neil | 05/21/04 13:19 |
| RE: ...and then what? | Bartosz Wucke | 05/21/04 21:55 |
| the mind of a typical Linux geek | Andy Neil | 05/21/04 22:08 |
| RE: 8051 and Lynix | Bartosz Wucke | 05/21/04 21:49 |
| Lynix? Linux? | Andy Neil | 05/21/04 22:10 |
RE: Lynix? Linux? | Bartosz Wucke | 05/24/04 15:01 |
| It was Linux | Shahzad Aslam | 05/22/04 03:19 |
| WHY?! | Andy Neil | 05/22/04 07:15 |
| RE: WHY?! | Erik Malund | 05/22/04 12:23 |
| RE: WHY?! | Andy Neil | 05/22/04 17:46 |
| RE: WHY?! | Andy Neil | 05/22/04 18:06 |
| Conclusion and why Linux | Shahzad Aslam | 05/23/04 05:57 |
| RE: Conclusion and why Linux | Dan Henry | 05/23/04 12:44 |
| RE: Dan Henry | Shahzad Aslam | 05/24/04 03:47 |