| ??? 05/21/04 21:49 Read: 316 times |
#70916 - RE: 8051 and Lynix Responding to: Shahzad's previous message |
Oh well...
I'm a Linux geek, but I understand some things. Linux needs about 1MB memory to run in the very minimalistic shape. 256 BYTES is just not enough. External memory is slow and hard to use. Linux is rather slow on 50MHZ hosts. 1MHZ makes it practically useless. If you plan on using the "external memory", divide the speed by factor of about 5. Despite the fact there are patches to Linux that allow it to run on architectures without memory protection, it loses all the ability to survive program errors. In other words, expect kernel panic instead of core dump. '51 C compilers are far from plain ANSI because of tricky architecture. So, answering your question... Yes, it is possible. It is possible to push a camel through the hole of a needle, but it requires a lot of work, resources and will change the camel a lot in the process. Feel free to try. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| 8051 and Lynix | Shahzad Aslam | 05/21/04 07:14 |
| RE: 8051 and Lynix | Jez Smith | 05/21/04 07:28 |
| Why? | Andy Neil | 05/21/04 08:23 |
| RE: What? | Erik Malund | 05/21/04 08:26 |
| RE: What? | Donald Catto | 05/21/04 08:49 |
| 8051 and linux | Narasimha Rao | 05/21/04 09:56 |
| Typo? | Andy Neil | 05/21/04 11:53 |
| RE: Typo? | Donald Catto | 05/21/04 12:24 |
| RE: Lynix | Andy Neil | 05/21/04 12:25 |
| RE: 8051 and Lynix | Steve M. Taylor | 05/21/04 10:33 |
| RE: MMU | Andy Neil | 05/21/04 11:59 |
| RE: MMU | Donald Catto | 05/21/04 12:27 |
| RE: ...and then what? | Andy Neil | 05/21/04 13:19 |
| RE: ...and then what? | Bartosz Wucke | 05/21/04 21:55 |
| the mind of a typical Linux geek | Andy Neil | 05/21/04 22:08 |
| RE: 8051 and Lynix | Bartosz Wucke | 05/21/04 21:49 |
| Lynix? Linux? | Andy Neil | 05/21/04 22:10 |
RE: Lynix? Linux? | Bartosz Wucke | 05/24/04 15:01 |
| It was Linux | Shahzad Aslam | 05/22/04 03:19 |
| WHY?! | Andy Neil | 05/22/04 07:15 |
| RE: WHY?! | Erik Malund | 05/22/04 12:23 |
| RE: WHY?! | Andy Neil | 05/22/04 17:46 |
| RE: WHY?! | Andy Neil | 05/22/04 18:06 |
| Conclusion and why Linux | Shahzad Aslam | 05/23/04 05:57 |
| RE: Conclusion and why Linux | Dan Henry | 05/23/04 12:44 |
| RE: Dan Henry | Shahzad Aslam | 05/24/04 03:47 |



