| Erik Malund 05/26/04 14:49 Read: 439 times Mt Airy, Nc USA |
#71265 - RE: 89C51 ISP Responding to: Andy Neil's previous message |
However, it is far more complicated than modern ISP schemes that require just a serial port; eg, the 89LPC932.
which is why I have stated several times "use an ISP chip" what reason can there be to use an older chip? For the P89LPC932 you will either need to istall some rather complicated logic or implement the NoTouch for LPC932 in my user page. The LPC932 will, fresh from the factory program without any special stuff, from then on you need a chip and a few other things to do it BUT ONLY IF you do not implement NoTouch. For that reason I suggest tha first ISP experience to be with chips such as the P89C51Rx2 or P89C66x. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Programmer for Atmel-89c51 | Ram Kumar | 05/24/04 05:45 |
| RE: Programmer for Atmel-89c51 | Prahlad J. Purohit | 05/24/04 06:24 |
RE: Programmer for Atmel-89c51 | Christian Kleiber | 05/27/04 21:39 |
| RE: Programmer for Atmel-89c51 | Raghunathan R | 05/24/04 06:40 |
| RE: Programmer for Atmel-89c51 | Jez Smith | 05/24/04 08:13 |
| RE: AEC Electronics? | Andy Neil | 05/24/04 08:47 |
| RE: Programmer for Atmel-89c51 | Abdul Mujid | 05/24/04 21:05 |
| RE: Programmer for Atmel-89c51 | Raghunathan R | 05/24/04 21:38 |
| RE: Programmer for Atmel-89c51 | Abdul Mujid | 05/24/04 21:55 |
| RE: Programmer for Atmel-89c51 | Abdul Mujid | 05/24/04 22:10 |
| RE: Programmer for Atmel-89c51 | Prahlad J. Purohit | 05/24/04 23:59 |
| RE: Programmer for Atmel-89c51 | Erik Malund | 05/25/04 10:22 |
| RE: Programmer for Atmel-89c51 | Abdul Mujid | 05/25/04 21:22 |
| RE: Programmer for Atmel-89c51 | Erik Malund | 05/26/04 08:12 |
| RE: Programmer for Atmel-89c51 | Abdul Mujid | 05/26/04 09:22 |
| RE: Programmer for Atmel-89c51 | Erik Malund | 05/26/04 09:32 |
| RE: 89C51 ISP | Andy Neil | 05/26/04 14:40 |
| RE: 89C51 ISP | Erik Malund | 05/26/04 14:49 |
| RE: what reason can there be... | Andy Neil | 05/26/04 15:38 |
| RE: what reason can there be... | IJAZ AHMED | 05/26/04 15:57 |
| RE: what reason can there be... | Charles Bannister | 05/27/04 00:30 |
| RE: what reason can there be... | Erik Malund | 05/27/04 07:51 |
| RE: what reason can there be... | IJAZ AHMED | 05/27/04 14:48 |
| RE: 89C51 ISP | Oleg Sergeev | 05/27/04 02:40 |
| NOT RECOMMENDED FOR NEW DESIGNS! | Andy Neil | 05/27/04 20:08 |
| RE: Programmer for Atmel-89c51 | Erik Malund | 05/26/04 09:32 |
| RE: Programming voltage | Andy Neil | 05/26/04 14:06 |
| RE: Programming voltage | Abdul Mujid | 05/26/04 20:52 |
| RE: Programming voltage | Christian Kleiber | 05/27/04 21:18 |
| RE: Programmer for Atmel-89c51 | Jez Smith | 05/24/04 08:14 |
| Go to the Atmel website... | Andy Neil | 05/24/04 08:31 |
| RE: Programmer for Atmel-89c51 | Mehmet Karakaya | 05/24/04 11:42 |
| RE: Programmer for Atmel-89c51 | Jez Smith | 05/24/04 11:57 |
| RE: AEC Electronics - working now | Andy Neil | 05/24/04 17:27 |
| RE: AEC Electronics - working now | Jez Smith | 05/25/04 01:08 |



