| Erik Malund 12/07/04 07:21 Read: 536 times Mt Airy, Nc USA |
#82696 - exceeding error budget Responding to: Steve M. Taylor's previous message |
Prahlad,
1) I have seen way too many "needs for recalibration" of things with a trimpot, you can use that method, but be warned. Trimpots are not very stable and "everyone" with a problem will tweek them, "just to see". 2) your solution with an OP7 is more expensive than a small eeprom holding a "correction factor". I am speaking from experience and take the advice or not. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Rogowski Coil Interchangeability. | Prahlad J. Purohit | 12/06/04 09:34 |
| echo | Steve M. Taylor | 12/06/04 10:35 |
| re: Echo | Prahlad J. Purohit | 12/06/04 11:05 |
| Still missed it then ? | Steve M. Taylor | 12/06/04 11:14 |
| I guess, standard practice for interchg | Erik Malund | 12/06/04 11:29 |
| Re: seeprom storing caliberation. | Prahlad J. Purohit | 12/06/04 11:43 |
| But I want something simpler. | Prahlad J. Purohit | 12/06/04 11:41 |
| stability | Erik Malund | 12/06/04 11:52 |
| 1-Wire = 3 Pins?! | Andy Neil | 12/06/04 17:43 |
| Calibration is unavoidable. | Steve M. Taylor | 12/06/04 16:36 |
| Calibetaion through POT. | Prahlad J. Purohit | 12/06/04 20:28 |
| error budget. | Steve M. Taylor | 12/07/04 04:47 |
| exceeding error budget | Erik Malund | 12/07/04 07:21 |
| OP07 amplifier | Prahlad J. Purohit | 12/09/04 08:01 |
| Re: Error Budget | Prahlad J. Purohit | 12/09/04 08:08 |
| CT versus Rogowski coil | Kai Klaas | 12/07/04 21:54 |
| Re: CT vs Rogowski Coil | Prahlad J. Purohit | 12/09/04 08:05 |
Solving in the frequency domain | Kai Klaas | 12/09/04 22:25 |



