| Prahlad J. Purohit 12/09/04 08:01 Read: 456 times Mumbai India |
#82826 - OP07 amplifier Responding to: Erik Malund's previous message |
Hi Erik,
Thanks for your reply, 2) your solution with an OP7 is more expensive than a small eeprom holding a "correction factor". I am speaking from experience and take the advice or not. You are right Erik a seeprom based soultion would be the cheapest and most reliable solution I asked that OP07 stuff just to look out for more possibilities. Thanks & Regards, Prahlad Purohit |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Rogowski Coil Interchangeability. | Prahlad J. Purohit | 12/06/04 09:34 |
| echo | Steve M. Taylor | 12/06/04 10:35 |
| re: Echo | Prahlad J. Purohit | 12/06/04 11:05 |
| Still missed it then ? | Steve M. Taylor | 12/06/04 11:14 |
| I guess, standard practice for interchg | Erik Malund | 12/06/04 11:29 |
| Re: seeprom storing caliberation. | Prahlad J. Purohit | 12/06/04 11:43 |
| But I want something simpler. | Prahlad J. Purohit | 12/06/04 11:41 |
| stability | Erik Malund | 12/06/04 11:52 |
| 1-Wire = 3 Pins?! | Andy Neil | 12/06/04 17:43 |
| Calibration is unavoidable. | Steve M. Taylor | 12/06/04 16:36 |
| Calibetaion through POT. | Prahlad J. Purohit | 12/06/04 20:28 |
| error budget. | Steve M. Taylor | 12/07/04 04:47 |
| exceeding error budget | Erik Malund | 12/07/04 07:21 |
| OP07 amplifier | Prahlad J. Purohit | 12/09/04 08:01 |
| Re: Error Budget | Prahlad J. Purohit | 12/09/04 08:08 |
CT versus Rogowski coil  | Kai Klaas | 12/07/04 21:54 |
| Re: CT vs Rogowski Coil | Prahlad J. Purohit | 12/09/04 08:05 |
Solving in the frequency domain | Kai Klaas | 12/09/04 22:25 |