Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
Charles Bannister
09/02/05 14:05
Read: 909 times
Honolulu
USA


 
#100489 - Define who WE are! Names only please.
Responding to: Erik Malund's previous message
Erik Malund said:

Does anyone think that we should "help" a raw rookie that show absolutely no understanding of what this is all about by fixing his/her so called "code".

Can you tell me who We are? Please respond with names only.

Regards,

Charles Bannister

List of 40 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Raw rookies, how to treat      Erik Malund      09/02/05 11:06      
   structured links      Kalpak Dabir      09/02/05 11:26      
      which a RAW rookie rarely is      Erik Malund      09/02/05 11:37      
      How about this?      Andy Neil      09/02/05 12:19      
   It's not the "raw rookie" bit...      Andy Neil      09/02/05 13:08      
   Define who WE are! Names only please.      Charles Bannister      09/02/05 14:05      
      to "respond with names only" I give you      Erik Malund      09/02/05 14:31      
      We've (sic) been here before      Andy Neil      09/02/05 15:53      
   I usually not      José Félix Díaz Ivorra      09/02/05 17:02      
      NFI      Russell Bull      09/02/05 18:04      
         An example      Kalpak Dabir      09/02/05 20:42      
            Like this, then?      Andy Neil      09/03/05 04:34      
               Andy PLEASE      Jan Waclawek      09/03/05 08:19      
                  He changed his tune...      Andy Neil      09/03/05 11:39      
                  ...and what did he do with it?      Andy Neil      09/06/05 00:07      
                     yes, but...      Jan Waclawek      09/06/05 01:40      
                        no, it is not      Erik Malund      09/06/05 09:10      
                        You call that progress?      Andy Neil      09/06/05 17:45      
         Very true        Craig Steiner      09/02/05 23:01      
            bible trouble      Andy Neil      09/03/05 03:00      
            Silence      Andy Neil      09/03/05 04:31      
            Chat Board !!      Vignesh Prasad      09/03/05 23:18      
            Young Wipper Snappers      Neil Kurzman      09/05/05 14:41      
               welcome worn out?      Russell Bull      09/06/05 05:21      
                  (non)8051 stuff      Jan Waclawek      09/06/05 05:45      
                     Better than 8051??      Russell Bull      09/06/05 18:30      
                     Help      Issa M. Omar      09/20/05 05:19      
                        I gladly would        Erik Malund      09/20/05 07:15      
                        Off-topic      Andy Neil      09/20/05 10:00      
                           Irony        Neil Kurzman      09/21/05 11:29      
                              Irony!      Andy Neil      09/21/05 13:28      
                                 Proper Subject      José Félix Díaz Ivorra      09/21/05 16:06      
                        using timer for 24h      Issa M. Omar      10/05/05 01:30      
                           start a new thread      Jan Waclawek      10/05/05 01:36      
                              a minor correction      Erik Malund      10/05/05 07:05      
   Example      Ian Bell      09/20/05 15:44      
      nothing new under the sun      Erik Malund      09/20/05 16:07      
         Not new      Ian Bell      09/22/05 06:50      
            I recall a case      Erik Malund      09/22/05 07:08      
               Response      Ian Bell      09/22/05 07:32      

Back to Subject List