Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
Erik Malund
10/26/05 12:34
Read: 777 times
Mt Airy, Nc
USA


 
#102982 - addendum
Responding to: Erik Malund's previous message
Conductivity would probably be a way; however I an 99.17% sure that using conductivity would require calibration based on soil type. That said, if calibration is required, so be it; however i would just luvve it if there was a method that was independent of soil type.

Erik

List of 16 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
soil dampness      Erik Malund      10/26/05 11:27      
   Conductivity?      Sasha Jevtic      10/26/05 11:58      
      Conductivity      Andy Neil      10/26/05 14:28      
   addendum      Erik Malund      10/26/05 12:34      
      Nutsy idea?      Craig Steiner      10/26/05 14:07      
      Configuration/calibration      Sasha Jevtic      10/26/05 14:40      
         that would not be calibration      Erik Malund      10/26/05 15:01      
            humidity      Terry Lingle      10/26/05 22:42      
      Water for a short while and compare      Bert Van Den Berg      10/27/05 02:36      
   Another idea      Bert Van Den Berg      10/27/05 13:17      
   Spatially Distributed Soil Measurements      Bruce Bailey      10/27/05 13:51      
      I needed that      Erik Malund      10/27/05 14:32      
         There is Yet Hope      Bruce Bailey      10/27/05 17:20      
   soil dampness      Bruce Revor      10/27/05 17:07      
      Gypsum block sensor      Rob Vassar      10/27/05 21:27      
   Capacitance.      Steve M. Taylor      10/28/05 12:36      

Back to Subject List