Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
Erik Malund
10/26/05 15:01
Read: 633 times
Mt Airy, Nc
USA


 
#102994 - that would not be calibration
Responding to: Sasha Jevtic's previous message
Can you ever really get rid of the calibration/configuration here completely? It seems to be an oversimplification to assume that every application would have the same threshold for when to irrigate and when not to.
were I to make this commercially (feel free) no calibration would be needed but there would be a setting "how wet do you want it".
By no calibration needed, there could be a marker at the setting pot "normal", that would not be possible if calibration was part of the game.

Erik


List of 16 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
soil dampness      Erik Malund      10/26/05 11:27      
   Conductivity?      Sasha Jevtic      10/26/05 11:58      
      Conductivity      Andy Neil      10/26/05 14:28      
   addendum      Erik Malund      10/26/05 12:34      
      Nutsy idea?      Craig Steiner      10/26/05 14:07      
      Configuration/calibration      Sasha Jevtic      10/26/05 14:40      
         that would not be calibration      Erik Malund      10/26/05 15:01      
            humidity      Terry Lingle      10/26/05 22:42      
      Water for a short while and compare      Bert Van Den Berg      10/27/05 02:36      
   Another idea      Bert Van Den Berg      10/27/05 13:17      
   Spatially Distributed Soil Measurements      Bruce Bailey      10/27/05 13:51      
      I needed that      Erik Malund      10/27/05 14:32      
         There is Yet Hope      Bruce Bailey      10/27/05 17:20      
   soil dampness      Bruce Revor      10/27/05 17:07      
      Gypsum block sensor      Rob Vassar      10/27/05 21:27      
   Capacitance.      Steve M. Taylor      10/28/05 12:36      

Back to Subject List