Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
Neil Kurzman
02/08/06 16:10
Read: 450 times
Ny
USA


 
#109562 - Because
Responding to: Kai Klaas's previous message

I would need to learn it up front. I may not have the time to learn the chip and tools for a short project. Plus, finding the warts is a pain. I did a PSOC project once. What a nightmare. On the surface the chip is great. The limitations helped kill the project. So, I can never use it again, here anyway. Can't get burned twice.

But I have heard good stuff about the AVR.

List of 18 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
What is like a PIC16F877      Neil Kurzman      02/07/06 21:50      
   Link.      Jez Smith      02/08/06 00:18      
      stupid magazine ..      Jez Smith      02/08/06 00:50      
         be realistic, guys        Erik Malund      02/08/06 06:44      
         No      Neil Kurzman      02/08/06 18:58      
   Really advantageous?        Kai Klaas      02/08/06 07:01      
      an answer      Erik Malund      02/08/06 07:25      
      multi-chip option      Jan Waclawek      02/08/06 08:20      
         that would require      Erik Malund      02/08/06 08:32      
            I had a look into PIC16F87x datasheet      Jan Waclawek      02/08/06 09:04      
               sounds a lot like a LPC93x      Erik Malund      02/08/06 09:33      
                  match      Jan Waclawek      02/08/06 09:46      
                  That is one of the toughest changeover      Kalpak Dabir      02/08/06 10:08      
                  Yes It does      Neil Kurzman      02/08/06 15:16      
         What I use...      Kai Klaas      02/08/06 09:33      
            Because      Neil Kurzman      02/08/06 16:10      
      Internal ADC uses      Oliver Sedlacek      02/09/06 06:21      
   DSPIC      Mahmood Elnasser      02/09/06 00:34      

Back to Subject List