Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
09/23/11 23:19
Read: 263 times


 
#183859 - use may use this code
Responding to: Ralph Sac's previous message
        .equ    OUTPIN,P2.1
        .equ    basecount,021h

          .org  0000h
          SJMP  MAIN

          .org  000bh           ;Use timer0
          LJMP  TIMER_ROUT

          .org  0070h

MAIN:     MOV   SP,#050H

          MOV   TMOD,#01H       ;initialise timer 0 in 16 bit mode

          mov   IP,#02h         ;give priority to timer0

          mov   TH0,#0ech       ;5ms timer count loaded
          mov   TL0,#078h       ;for 12 Mhz crystal

          ;The formula for deciding count is like
          ;(65535 - 5000) = 60535 here 5000 count for 5ms timer
          ;if you want to generate 1 ms timer then your formula should be
          ;(65525 - 1000) = 64535 and so on.
          ;So here we get count for 5ms timer = 60535D = EC78H =TH0TL0

          setb  TR0             ;turns on timer0
main1:
          MOV   IE,#082H        ;1000 0010 Enables timer0 interrupt

          sjmp  main1

TIMER_ROUT:

;After Every 5ms time the timer interrupt jumps here

          mov   TH0,#0ech       ;Reload timer count
          mov   TL0,#078h

          inc   basecount
          mov   a,basecount
          cjne  a,#50,skipchangestatus  

          cpl   OUTPIN          ;after every 50 * 5 = 250 ms compliment the OutputPin status
                                ;So you get 2 low 2 high output status in 1 sec i.e 2 Hz freq.
          mov   basecount,#0    ;reset the base count

skipchangestatus:
          reti                  ;return from timer interrupt



List of 42 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Need a little help with frequency      Ralph Sac      09/16/11 21:32      
   use 89c52      Maunik Choksi      09/16/11 23:00      
   "formulae"      Stefan KAnev      09/16/11 23:34      
   How to post legible source code - and text      Andy Neil      09/17/11 10:43      
      Legible source code      Ralph Sac      09/17/11 16:09      
         Not the whole message!      Andy Neil      09/17/11 16:16      
            Thanks Andy got little messed up      Ralph Sac      09/17/11 17:00      
               Already answered      Per Westermark      09/17/11 18:43      
                  Still not understanding isr with tick      Ralph Sac      09/23/11 21:33      
                     use may use this code      Maunik Choksi      09/23/11 23:19      
                        Thanks for time      Ralph Sac      09/24/11 18:43      
                        Rewrote Source Code for Metalink Assembler      Ralph Sac      10/20/11 18:36      
                           keil assembler      Maunik Choksi      10/20/11 23:25      
                           No need for picture      Maunik Choksi      10/21/11 07:36      
                     try      Stefan KAnev      09/23/11 23:34      
                        the code above is a typical illustration of ...      Erik Malund      09/24/11 07:35      
                           You are right      Ralph Sac      09/24/11 18:39      
                              never too old      Erik Malund      09/25/11 06:46      
                                 Never too late to pick up a new trick      Per Westermark      09/25/11 09:10      
                                    One good trick ...      Richard Erlacher      09/25/11 13:49      
                                 Score -1      Michael Karas      09/25/11 19:59      
                                    Learn one before Jumping head      Ralph Sac      09/26/11 21:11      
                                       Learning Assembler First      Michael Karas      09/27/11 00:41      
                                          I wholehardely concur.      Erik Malund      09/27/11 08:03      
                        Thanks also you for your time      Ralph Sac      09/24/11 18:46      
   Here's something to try ...      Richard Erlacher      09/24/11 14:57      
   One suggession for higher frequency      Maunik Choksi      09/26/11 02:00      
      Remember no fractional part for      Per Westermark      09/26/11 06:02      
         Precise frequency      Mahmood Elnasser      09/26/11 09:00      
      I did not know that      Ralph Sac      09/26/11 21:15      
         89c2051      Stefan KAnev      09/26/11 22:10      
            When you wrote code      Ralph Sac      09/27/11 12:10      
               You normally always need to test - but may not need to debug      Per Westermark      09/27/11 15:20      
               it was example      Stefan KAnev      09/27/11 15:20      
                  Ok then if I      Ralph Sac      09/27/11 15:40      
                     try      Stefan KAnev      09/27/11 21:54      
                     depends      Erik Malund      09/28/11 06:54      
                     Testing Code      Michael Karas      09/28/11 07:25      
                        In short      Per Westermark      09/28/11 08:41      
                           someone said it better      Erik Malund      09/28/11 09:03      
                              "Proven Product" Syndrome      Andy Neil      09/29/11 01:24      
                     Did you ever look at that MIDE51 I previously mentioned?      Richard Erlacher      10/21/11 01:39      

Back to Subject List