| Joseph Hebert 12/18/11 16:17 Read: 152 times Okemah, Ok United States Msg Score: +1 +1 Informative |
#185149 - shock sensors Responding to: Jecksons Ben's previous message |
Okay Jecksons,
I'm sorry I couldn't be of more help to you. Nonetheless, I stand by my fundamental advice that you abandon the idea of a shock sensor. In order for one to be reliable it would have to have an operational zone in which it would definitely trip at even the most infinitesimal movement if someone tried to move it, but be insensitive to even the slightest of movements associated with normal, non-threatening environmental disturbances (e.g. someone bumping into the table or a truck driving by outside). But since all of these infinitesimal movements are identical, save the fact that in the first case someone is touching the device, you're basically saying that it needs to only react to someone touching it, not to the slight tremors that a shock sensor would detect. Now you could use some sort of capacitive detection, like one of those lamps (or that new faucet) that you turn on just by touching it. I've used such sensors to secure safes in the past. It does take some effort to keep them from being too sensitive, but unlike shock sensors (where it's literally and logically impossible) it can be done. Good luck, Joe |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Freeze..thief protection | JecksonS Ben | 12/10/11 07:27 |
| Alarm Sensors | Joseph Hebert | 12/10/11 11:06 |
| Earth magnetic field sensor | Bert Van Den Berg | 12/19/11 10:36 |
| inexpensive solid state magnetic field | JecksonS Ben | 12/20/11 01:36 |
| It means.. | JecksonS Ben | 12/28/11 04:27 |
| ??? | Per Westermark | 12/28/11 06:11 |
same | JecksonS Ben | 12/31/11 04:12 |
| Too vague! | Andy Neil | 12/10/11 12:04 |
| Cost - and what type of protection/detection | Per Westermark | 12/10/11 13:21 |
| How low is "low" cost? | Andy Neil | 12/11/11 07:33 |
| OK..great..maybe Links | JecksonS Ben | 12/11/11 23:41 |
| Still no idea what you actually want | Andy Neil | 12/12/11 14:12 |
| What exactly? | JecksonS Ben | 12/12/11 23:53 |
| Bounce | Per Westermark | 12/13/11 00:59 |
| OK | JecksonS Ben | 12/14/11 00:32 |
| If it's networked | Andy Neil | 12/14/11 13:43 |
| hard to handle | JecksonS Ben | 12/15/11 01:19 |
| Come on ... it requires a number | Richard Erlacher | 12/15/11 08:42 |
| numbers | JecksonS Ben | 12/16/11 01:02 |
| cost and reliability | Joseph Hebert | 12/16/11 06:36 |
| cost | JecksonS Ben | 12/17/11 03:44 |
| Does that mean you don't know what your price target it? | Richard Erlacher | 12/17/11 08:57 |
| soft base | Joseph Hebert | 12/17/11 10:11 |
| manufacture products | JecksonS Ben | 12/18/11 03:07 |
| shock sensors | Joseph Hebert | 12/18/11 16:17 |
| advice | JecksonS Ben | 12/19/11 00:49 |
| Capacitive solutions can be projective | Per Westermark | 12/19/11 01:00 |
| metal.. | JecksonS Ben | 12/19/11 01:09 |



