Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
Joseph Hebert
04/07/12 18:37
Read: 386 times
Okemah, Ok
United States


 
#187055 - time of flight
Responding to: Per Westermark's previous message
Hi Per,

The "camera" is a time-of-flight imager. It measures the time between the firing of the pulse and the return of individual photons (or photon clusters, I'm not sure which). The YouTube video demonstration says that they have 0.6 mm resolution of the time-of-flight, which implies a 2 ps window of "exposure" (sampling) frame rate.

And before you ask, I have not at all wrapped my little mind around the algorithm that reconstructs the object based on time-of-flight. That would be the fascinating part. Well, that and the whole femto-second laser pulse with a pico-second sampling frame rate.

I guess if you know the distance to the initial wall that you strike, and you know the distance to the second wall you would strike, that gives you some information about when you would expect reflected photons to return. You could then start calculating possible surface locations of any that return at an unexpected time. Any photons that return before you'd expect if they made it as far as the second wall would have to come from something closer than the second wall. And photons that reflected off of the rear surface of the object would return later than those that only hit the two walls. I suppose after multiple pulse/samples you'd start to see an image sharpen up, especially if you're also measuring the position (angle maybe?) of the returning photons in a 2-D field of view.

Anyway, if you haven't looked at the video, give it a look. It's pretty impressive.

Joe

List of 13 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
"seeing" around corners      Joseph Hebert      04/06/12 09:12      
   Nobody finds this interesting?      Joseph Hebert      04/07/12 09:27      
      Its holiday time      Jez Smith      04/07/12 14:32      
         Reflection?        Per Westermark      04/07/12 16:18      
            Normally      Jez Smith      04/08/12 03:38      
               paralax      Joseph Hebert      04/08/12 06:06      
                  No its not parralax      Jez Smith      04/08/12 08:30      
               But loss of reflection is just secondary result of off-axis      Per Westermark      04/08/12 15:04      
               That's why they have the features on those view cameras      Richard Erlacher      04/08/12 19:35      
      2D?      Per Westermark      04/07/12 16:20      
         time of flight      Joseph Hebert      04/07/12 18:37      
   Bostonian      Andy Peters      04/09/12 11:15      
      I don't see that as an overstatement      Richard Erlacher      04/09/12 11:25      

Back to Subject List