Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
Andy Peters
06/04/12 10:32
Read: 449 times
Tucson, Az
USA


 
#187611 - Who writes that crap?
Responding to: Richard Erlacher's previous message


In order to do this kind of hacking, the FPGA has to be removed from the target board and installed into a ZIF socket.

So this requires:
a) access to the target board (good luck with that)
b) the ability to remove an SMT device from a board without damaging it (good luck with that)
c) putting the part into a test jig with a ZIF socket (I suppose you could reball a BGA, but good luck with that)
d) and then what?

What's the intent? It's not like the hacker can remotely reprogram the FPGA to have to do some evil thing (like bring down a plane or focus a laser beam on the White House). The hacker needs to have access to the JTAG port in order to do anything malicious. Even if the hacker wanted to clone the device, he needs access to it.

Anyways, the flash-based Actel FPGAs aren't the highest-security options. If you want that, you're into OTP devices (other Actel families, QuickLogic, certain Xilinx and Altera parts).

-a

List of 17 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
have you seen this?      Richard Erlacher      05/30/12 22:31      
   Backdoor access      Oliver Sedlacek      05/31/12 05:15      
      What's the big deal?      Richard Erlacher      05/31/12 06:35      
      Crypto keys      Per Westermark      05/31/12 06:42      
         High security chips      Oliver Sedlacek      05/31/12 07:28      
            IP theft      Maarten Brock      06/01/12 07:20      
               as far as IP theft is concerned ...      Richard Erlacher      06/01/12 09:47      
   Its really      Jez Smith      06/01/12 09:22      
      Biggest problems is still processor copy-protection      Per Westermark      06/01/12 09:43      
         so Mr Evil Hacker gets his keys      Jez Smith      06/01/12 16:25      
            Mr Evil Hacker is most definitely busy      Per Westermark      06/02/12 10:33      
   Who writes that crap?      Andy Peters      06/04/12 10:32      
      Don't think so much about modification as in extraction      Per Westermark      06/04/12 13:54      
      The people who write that crap...      Jez Smith      06/04/12 15:08      
         c'mon, Jez!      Andy Peters      06/06/12 15:12      
      Never mind who writes it ....      Andy Neil      06/05/12 05:27      
         Right on!      Richard Erlacher      06/05/12 09:46      

Back to Subject List