Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
Per Westermark
06/18/12 08:08
Read: 609 times
Sweden


 
#187770 - So?
Responding to: Jez Smith's previous message
Nothing wrong with C++ in embedded systems - as long as your embedded processor supports a "this" pointer without dying.

C++ is not equivalent with billions of new/delete in the code or a forced use of huge stream or STL libraries.

So you can have identical efficiency compared to C. Just with extended rules for type checking, name spaces, data encapsulation etc.

List of 16 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Who the hell uses C++ in embedded systems...      Jez Smith      06/18/12 06:58      
   So?      Per Westermark      06/18/12 08:08      
   beware of (verbal) inflation.      Erik Malund      06/18/12 10:17      
   Not as many as some would think.      Neil Kurzman      06/18/12 11:43      
      2% don't know      Jez Smith      06/18/12 13:00      
         Same same      Per Westermark      06/18/12 13:46      
         Surveys      Andy Neil      06/18/12 14:26      
   Me!      Oliver Sedlacek      06/19/12 04:30      
      Using tools that only supports C?      Per Westermark      06/19/12 05:13      
         Tools and MISRA      Oliver Sedlacek      06/19/12 06:22      
   C++ "better than C" for embedded systems      Oliver Sedlacek      07/11/12 20:48      
      as far as the '51 goes      Erik Malund      07/12/12 01:16      
         As far as '51 goes - C++ is still viable      Per Westermark      07/12/12 02:05      
            class vs source      Andy Peters      07/12/12 03:51      
         I did say "smallish"      Oliver Sedlacek      07/12/12 08:11      
            Overkill?      Per Westermark      07/12/12 19:01      

Back to Subject List